|
|||
Case Play 4.2.3 sit E
I’m sure this has been discussed in this forum previously, if so I apologize but I missed it.
4.2.3 sit E: Ks’ ball, 4th and 12 on R’s 45-yard line. K8’s punt is rolling on R’s 16 when an inadverted whistle sounds. R76 blocks K84 in the back on R’s 22-yard line during the down prior to the whistle. Ruling: If the penalty is accepted, the foul negates the inadverted whistle and results in a previous spot enforcement. >>> declined …. Why is this a previous spot enforcement?
__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. |
|
|||
The foul doesn't meet the requirements of post-scrimmage kick enforcement as it happened during the kick. If the foul is declined it's an automatic replay of the down from the previous spot because you have an inadvertent whistle during a kick.
Also, the spelling is "inadvertent" |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Ks’ ball, 4th and 12 on R’s 45-yard line. R1 holds K2 at R’s 48-yard line. K8’s punt is in flight near the 50 yard line when an inadvertent whistle is blown. If PSK were the enforcement spot, K would be forced to decline a foul in order to replay the down. Why not just add inadvertent whistle to the PSK definition or at very least an explanation in the case book on this play?
__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Case play 7.1.1 is not correct | JTRICE | Basketball | 46 | Thu Oct 12, 2006 08:33am |
Case Play, Part II | ejstuart | Soccer | 6 | Mon May 03, 2004 08:48pm |
Case Play | ejstuart | Soccer | 3 | Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:43am |
What about Case Play 10.8-1? | Dakota | Softball | 4 | Sun Nov 16, 2003 01:54pm |
FED case play 8.1.1L | David Emerling | Baseball | 5 | Sat Mar 15, 2003 12:58am |