The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 15, 2006, 09:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 225
Substitution question

Possibly a two part question:

I realize under 3-7-3 that it is illegal for a substitute to become a player and then withdraw and vice versa during the same dead ball period. However, is it legal for the 11th player, who wrongly thinks he's the 12th player, to leave the field, realize his mistake, and then return?

Part 2 (If the above situation is legal): If this player is an offensive player, and before leaving the field had established himself between the 9 yard marks after the RFP, must he re-establish himself between the 9's when he returns to the field?

(All of this assuming an absence of intent to deceive, etc.)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 15, 2006, 09:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
Depends on who you believe.

Casebook 3.7.3 Sit A: is your play.
NFHS says this is illegal.
Redding guide says it's not. I happen to believe the Redding guide and their comentary as to why he wasn't a substitute when he returned prior to the snap.

As far as your part II goes, that's a damn good question. I've not really thought about that even after knowing the Redding interpretation on this.
I would have to then say YES, he should be required to touch up inside the 9-yard marks.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 15, 2006, 11:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theisey
Depends on who you believe.

Casebook 3.7.3 Sit A: is your play.
NFHS says this is illegal.
Redding guide says it's not. I happen to believe the Redding guide and their comentary as to why he wasn't a substitute when he returned prior to the snap.
Interesting point about Theisey's reply - last year Redding said this was illegal and the NFHS said it was legal. This year's editions of both books have this interpretation marked as a change.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 10:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: I'd love to know under what rule the Fed decided to make this illegal. The definition of a "player" (which this guy is) says that he "...continues to be a player until a substitute enters the field and indicates to the player that he is replaced, or when the substitute otherwise becomes a player." Neither of these two things happened, so he's still a player. And 3-7-3 says that he can't "...withdraw and re-enter as a substitute." He didn't do that either. Looks like another case of the Fed making up a ruling with no rule support.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2006, 01:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 162
I agree with BOB M. What happens if the player goes next to the sideline and steps on the sideline before the snap and then comes back onto the field before the snap?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Substitution question mj Baseball 1 Sat May 06, 2006 07:39pm
substitution question just another ref Basketball 4 Thu Dec 01, 2005 09:54pm
Substitution Question Chooky Basketball 6 Sat Jan 08, 2005 02:25pm
Substitution question swordfish Football 2 Thu Jan 08, 2004 01:11pm
Substitution question Jay R Baseball 16 Thu Jul 31, 2003 03:54pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1