The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 25, 2006, 10:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 225
What's wrong with this play?

http://hogs-hill-sec.blogspot.com/20...-play-for.html

(The closeup replay toward the end is especially revealing)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 25, 2006, 10:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 40
There are a few questionable issues with this play.

1) Did A have 7 men on the line? At first I questioned this due to the Holder's postioning not being square to the line. But after further review, they had seven on the line outside the hash.

2) Were those 7 men actually on the line of scrimmage? The ball is on A37 and the linemen outside the hash appear to be on A36 and standing almost straight up. But..the holder does have his body turned and his foot way back. I'll give the line the benefit of the doubt here. I don't have a problem with that.

3) PROBLEM!! A7 never gets set. In fact, he's moving forward at the line. IS or IM, take your pick. This should have been called.

Great play though...never seen something like that not on a try before.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 25, 2006, 10:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by CruiseMan
3) PROBLEM!! A7 never gets set. In fact, he's moving forward at the line. IS or IM, take your pick. This should have been called.
That, and the center never getting set, were the two problems I had. Plus the Alabama coach on the field at the snap.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 25, 2006, 11:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 508
Ref shoufd have held RFP until coaches were off the field.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 12:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
I don't know NCAA rules. NFHS states snapper's shoulders must be parallel with the LOS.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 12:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fayette Missouri
Posts: 100
Where exactly does it say that a snappers shoulders must be parallel with LOS, doesnt say that in 7-1
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 01:09am
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Yeah, that's pretty close to a violation of 7-3-c - failure of snapper to completely pause before the snap.

And techincally, the snapper only has to have their shoulders "approximately parallel" to the LOS. (2-31-14) He looks fine to me in the play.

Last edited by HawkeyeCubP; Tue Sep 26, 2006 at 01:35am.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 09:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by cougar729
Where exactly does it say that a snappers shoulders must be parallel with LOS, doesnt say that in 7-1
REPLY: Since the snapper is a 'lineman,' he must comply with NF 2-31-9 which says that his shoulders need to be "...shoulders approximately parallel" to the LOS. ANd 2-31-14 says explicitly that the snapper must comply.

And...I think that the R blew the RFP too early. I would never have blown it while team B was walking back onto the field.
__________________
Bob M.

Last edited by Bob M.; Tue Sep 26, 2006 at 09:25am.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 09:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 127
1. RFP should not have been blown with B still coming onto field and B coaches still on the field. If they are "delaying" flag them for DOG, but do not blow the RFP.

2. A-7 very clearly never sets - IM

3. Snapper clearly never sets - IM
__________________
"It's easy to get the players, Getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part." - Casey Stengel
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob M.
REPLY: Since the snapper is a 'lineman,' he must comply with NF 2-31-9 which says that his shoulders need to be "...shoulders approximately parallel" to the LOS. ANd 2-31-14 says explicitly that the snapper must comply.

And...I think that the R blew the RFP too early. I would never have blown it while team B was walking back onto the field.
There is no 2-31-9 or 2-31-14 this is NCAA rules

Last edited by radwaste50; Tue Sep 26, 2006 at 10:48am.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 12:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by radwaste50
There is no 2-31-9 or 2-31-14 this is NCAA rules
REPLY: Sorry...forgot which set of rules we were discussing on this one.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 12:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Maybe its a bad video, but it appeared to me the players were set sufficiently. They certainly didn't appear to mimic the start of a play.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 12:35pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by radwaste50
There is no 2-31-9 or 2-31-14 this is NCAA rules
This is taken from the NCAA FB Rules:
2-27-4-1:
Lineman
"A lineman is any Team A player legally on his scrimmage line when
the ball is snapped. An interior lineman is any Team A player legally
on his scrimmage line and positioned between the end Team A players
who are also on the line of scrimmage at the snap. An ineligible pass
receiver of Team A is “on his scrimmage line’’ at the snap when he
faces his opponent’s goal line with the line of his shoulders parallel
thereto and his head breaking the plane of the line drawn through the
waistline of the snapper."

2-27-8:
Snapper
"The snapper is the player who snaps the ball. He becomes the
snapper when he assumes his position and touches or simulates (hand[s] at
or below his knees) touching the ball (Rule 7-1-3-a-1)."

I can't find anything in the NCAA Rules that says, verbatim, that the snapper, or a lineman, for that matter must have their shoulders parallel to the LOS - it only mentions it in determining the eligibility/ineligibility of A players.

I'm sure I'm missing something though, if not the implied and expected inference that that's the way it is.

NCAA people?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
I can't find anything in the NCAA Rules that says, verbatim, that the snapper, or a lineman, for that matter must have their shoulders parallel to the LOS - it only mentions it in determining the eligibility/ineligibility of A players.
I disagree for a lineman. Read your quoted rule again- it mentions the shoulders in determining if an ineligible player is on the line or not.

I agree about the snapper though- it doesn't seem like a requirement for him since it doesn't say a snapper must meet the requirements for a lineman.

I'm glad I'm a deep guy.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 26, 2006, 01:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,023
Looked to me like they didn't set for a second. That would have been my issue.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not that there's anything wrong with that... Dan_ref Basketball 24 Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:28am
Ump Wrong Then Right Boston99 Baseball 4 Fri Sep 10, 2004 09:08am
What was I doing wrong? Mark Padgett Basketball 6 Sun Feb 01, 2004 08:27am
wrong way Adam Basketball 6 Mon Dec 15, 2003 04:19pm
did I do anything wrong? refjef40 Softball 6 Sat Apr 14, 2001 07:54pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1