|
Mon Oct 18, 2004, 02:36pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, the judgement of the official is not in question, nor am I asking what right does he have DQ a player. What I am asking is that it appeared that the official was qualifying the extension of the arm and locking the elbow was based upon a ruling that would constitute a flagrant foul. What is in question is the interpretation of a rule that appears to be non-existant. What I am asking is there such a rule that gives this definition?
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
