View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 18, 2004, 06:14pm
wolfpup27 wolfpup27 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17
Again, I guess I am looking at "an extended arm and locked" elbow as the reasoning behind the difference between a slap to the helmet (9-5) and adding a flagrancy violation on top. This official determined that because it met this criteria that it constituted flagrancy and DQ. Where is this definition is all that I am asking? If it does not exist, then does it not stand to reason that this is a misapplication of a rule that does not exist?
Reply With Quote