High elbows with contact

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by BigCat

10-3 sends dq player to team bench. case play 10.5 says you can require team to escort him to locker room if need be...incite crowd etc. thx

Thanks, as I read that, it's another wording of a rule that seems to leave a little doubt. The case play says "...the official should require the individual who has committed a flagrant foul to leave the facility of the court with an adult supervisor." The book often uses absolute words, such as "require," and then you read something that says should? Just one more thing for people with no life, such as myself, to nit-pick...

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by frezer11

Thanks, as I read that, it's another wording of a rule that seems to leave a little doubt. The case play says "...the official should require the individual who has committed a flagrant foul to leave the facility of the court with an adult supervisor." The book often uses absolute words, such as "require," and then you read something that says should? Just one more thing for people with no life, such as myself, to nit-pick...

It is just emphasizing that you have that authority on flagrant situations. It isnt required. If you think allowing player to stay incites crowd, other team ....you should send him off with an adult they say. Giving guidance. If his presence wont incite folks he stays. Up to you as the official to decide/exercise discretion. thx

[NormanDale]

Originally Posted by constable

You have 3 options.
1. Player Control.
2. Intentional Personal Foul
3. Flagrant Personal Foul.

A technical foul in NFHS rules is not permissible.

Thank you for this - I botched this the other night, realized it after the fact and was trying to find rules to support my notion that I had botched it. Intentional Foul = less paperwork!