Traveling Violation - Coaching Points (VIDEO)

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Nope.



Not obvious is not the same thing as not happening.

If it happened, even though it may take some a slo-mo or paused video to see it, it still happened. If it is called in such a case, the call is still correct.

Officials that can see it and tell the difference shouldn't have to dumb down their calls for those who can't tell what happened.

I see a lot of those types of plays in real time. My eyes are trained from watching many of these plays and by quickly identifying a pivot foot.

But I'm calling the game in real time and people are watching it in real time. It just isn't that important to me to be able to say "gotcha" on one that nobody else in the building thinks is a travel.

It's rare that any of us move on our philosophy in these threads, so I wonder what the point is sometimes. There are people here (and I'm not specifically referring to the post I'm responding to) who think traveling is a major problem in hoops and it's their goal to let everyone know that. And I just don't care -- I just want to get the ones I'm expected to get (that actually are travels).

[so cal lurker]

An aside: My sense, perhaps clouded by the years, is that travelling, double driblling, and carrying [yes, I know not separately in the book...] are all called more leniently at the HS level than they were 30 years ago when I played. Any of the, um, more senior refs out there have any sense if that is true or if I'm just turning into one of those crumudgens blathering about "back in my day . . . "? (Along the same lines, it seems HS allows a lot more physical contact, especially on the perimiter, than I recall being acceptable.)

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by so cal lurker

An aside: My sense, perhaps clouded by the years, is that travelling, double dribbling, and carrying [yes, I know not separately in the book...] are all called more leniently at the HS level than they were 30 years ago when I played. Any of the, um, more senior refs out there have any sense if that is true or if I'm just turning into one of those curmudgeons blathering about "back in my day . . . "? (Along the same lines, it seems HS allows a lot more physical contact, especially on the perimeter, than I recall being acceptable.)

I don't think you're wrong at all.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Rich

I see a lot of those types of plays in real time. My eyes are trained from watching many of these plays and by quickly identifying a pivot foot.

But I'm calling the game in real time and people are watching it in real time. It just isn't that important to me to be able to say "gotcha" on one that nobody else in the building thinks is a travel.

It's rare that any of us move on our philosophy in these threads, so I wonder what the point is sometimes. There are people here (and I'm not specifically referring to the post I'm responding to) who think traveling is a major problem in hoops and it's their goal to let everyone know that. And I just don't care -- I just want to get the ones I'm expected to get (that actually are travels).

I don't think traveling is a big problem, and I don't want to call a travel that has to be reveiwed in stop motion animation replay to verify. This video, while close, seems clear enough to me that I'd call it in real time.
Certainly it's close enough I'm not going to say the guy on the floor with a better angle of the gather was wrong.

[Rooster]

Originally Posted by Rich

It's rare that any of us move on our philosophy in these threads, so I wonder what the point is sometimes.

For those of us who post less than others, this kind of debate is VERY helpful. We benefit from your back and forth so it is far from pointless and I am glad y'all get into it. I'll go back to my seat now and finish my popcorn...