![]() |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
Most points scored by 1 player on 1 play - 10/15/other?
Under NFHS rules, what are the most points that can be theoretically scored by one player on a single basketball play? Exclude repeated technical/intentional/flagrant fouls.
I was using Case book from 2008-2009. (case plays listed may be different in current books) Based on (Multiple Foul) Case 4.19.11, it could be 10. B1-B5 simultaneously foul A1 attempting an unsuccessful 3-point shot? 2x5 = 10 Based on (False Multiple Foul) Case 4.19.12, it could be 15. B1-B5 foul A1, all at different times, attempting an unsuccessful 3-point shot? 3x5 = 15 For False Multiple Fouls, if it is always and only 2 shots for each foul, then it would be 10 and not 15. Please confirm or disprove these thoughts. Looking for rule/case references only, not stuff like whether it could happen or anything along those lines. Last edited by luvhoops; Tue Jan 13, 2015 at 04:56pm. Reason: Additional info |
|
|||
Quote:
And if the 3-point shot is unsuccessful, the offended player gets 2 free throws for each foul, which could yield 4 points.
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . ![]() |
|
|||
has anyone ever seen anything like that? I've never seen a ref call multiple fouls on a shot(of the d) even though it does happen.
I'm confused. How would it be 10fts? If two fouls on a three point shot, then three fts for each? So that equals 6. If the player made the three point shot, then fts for each foul? That equals 5. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Thanks, I was seeing it as B1 and B5, not all 5 opponents on the floor. What was that Cartoon movie - Space Jam? . . .
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . ![]() |
|
|||
The cases were cited for mere reference. Why is everyone freaking out? In my question I used the word "theoretically."
As usual on this site, no one can give a clear answer. I was only looking for a number followed by a rule/case citation, nothing more. Even bob jenkins had to add "..its going to be viewed.." How it is viewed is irrelevant given what actually happened. I specifically went out of the way to say "not stuff like whether it could happen or anything along those lines." and it didn't matter. One person even called it "pointless" but yet posted, lol. |
|
|||
Situation: With just a few seconds remaining in the fourth quarter, B leads A by a score of 109 to 20. A1 attempts a three-point try, which is unsuccessful. While A1 is in the act of shooting, players B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5 commit a personal foul against A1 at approximately the same time. The clock is stopped with 0.5 seconds remaining. B's head coach, unhappy with the call, disrespectfully addresses an official and is charged with an unsporting technical foul. B's head coach disrespectfully addresses an official a second time and is charged with a second unsporting technical foul. Players B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5 each disrespectfully address an official two times and are each charged with two unsporting technical fouls. Bench personnel B6, B7, B8, B9, B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, as well as four of the team's five assistant coaches, disrespectfully address an official two times apiece and are each charged with two unsporting technical fouls. B's head coach; players B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5; and bench personnel B6, B7, B8, B9, B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, and the four assistant coaches who had been charged with two unsporting technical fouls are all disqualified. The other two bench personnel, B15 and the other assistant coach, disrespectfully address an official once and are each charged with one unsporting technical foul.
Ruling: This is a false multiple foul consisting of a multiple foul and several technical fouls. All awarded free throws will be shot with no players in marked lane spaces. A1 is awarded ten free throws for the multiple foul by B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5. After these free throws, any player or eligible substitute for A may shoot any or all of the 80 free throws awarded for the 40 technical fouls charged to B players and bench personnel. A will then be awarded a throw-in at the division line. The only B team member remaining is B15. B shall forfeit the game unless the referee believes B has an opportunity to win the game. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
What if A1 misses the shot, how many free throws would be awarded? |
|
|||
Incorrect. How it's viewed is very relevant to this play, and it's clear. It's NOT a false multiple foul (that would be separate "plays" if I understand what you are asking), but it is a multiple foul. 10 FTs max.
|
|
|||
[QUOTE=potato;950230]Are you guys saying if A1 goes up for a 2pt layup, gets fouled by B1 and continues for a shot and B2 comes in to block the shot but fouls A1, and the shot enters, A1 gets another 2 free throws 1 for each foul? never seen it before.[/quote[
By rule, yes. In practice, no. Quote:
1 FT for each foul if no try, a 2-point try (successful or not), or a successful 3-point try. 2 FTs for each foul if an unsuccessful 3-point try, or an I or F |
|
|||
Quote:
The first case/play is indeed a multiple foul according to the case book. The second case/play is indeed a false multiple foul according to the case book. So, not sure what you meant by "it." So frustrating. Pronouns should be outlawed, lol. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
7 points in a championship game....7 dang points?! | OrStBballRef | Basketball | 30 | Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:17am |
Int Between Player who has already scored and F2 | Rattlehead | Softball | 6 | Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:14pm |
How is this play scored? | John Robertson | Baseball | 21 | Fri Jun 03, 2005 11:43pm |
How's this scored? | akalsey | Baseball | 8 | Thu Jul 15, 2004 12:17pm |
Run scored | CK | Baseball | 10 | Tue Jul 08, 2003 05:51pm |