Possession of Ball to Travel?

[bob jenkins]

I think there's even a case on this -- or maybe the case is only NCAAW.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I think there's even a case on this -- or maybe the case is only NCAAW.

It's in NCAAW. Scenario is different but the logic behind the ruling is explained.

A.R. 196. A1 is on the floor with the ball lodged between the upper part of the legs. B1 attempts to gain possession of the ball by placing two hands firmly on the ball; however, A1 applies vice-like force with the upper legs, which prevents B1 from gaining possession of the ball.

RULING: A1 has committed a kicking violation. Kicking the ball is defined as striking the ball intentionally with any part of the leg. The intent of this rule is to prevent a player from gaining an advantage by using any part of the leg. Since A1 was not holding the ball in her hands, B1’s firm placement of her hands on the ball does not constitute a held ball. (Rule 9-7.2)

The OP in this thread has A1 standing - at least in scenario #2. If A1 is standing there’s a better than average chance (s)he is applying force to keep the ball where it is.

[bd41flpk]

Thanks Gents for all of the rule and case book references. As usual the cooperation here is quite huge - much appreciated !

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays !

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

It's in NCAAW. Scenario is different but the logic behind the ruling is explained.

It is the same in NCAA-M. I posted the same case book play above and it came from men's side.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by johnny d

It is the same in NCAA-M. I posted the same case book play above and it came from men's side.

The NFHS has no such case play, ruling or interp that I know of.