The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:22pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfp View Post
It's a question on this year's IAABO test, that's why I bring it up. The idea of counting the basket if it went in seemed strange.
Interesting. I should probably get started on that.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:26pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,044
Jet Man gave us the appropriate Casebook Play/Approved Rulings (CP/AR) for boys'/girls' H.S. and women's college. The ruling for NCAA Men's would be the same.

While we can debate the probabilities of an IPF or FPF being committed by a Shooter let us look at this play at a slightly different angle to see why the CP/ARs are what they are.

We can divide Personal Fouls (PF) into three categories:
(1) IPF;
(2) FPF;
(3) all other PFs.

Category (3) can be subdivided into:
(a) Common Fouls (CF);
(b) fouls committed against a Player Trying or Tapping for a Field Goal (FG);
(c) not a IF, FF, part of a Double Foul (DF) or a Multiple Foul (MF).

We also know that by definition a Player Control Foul (PCF) is a CF.

How can we approach A1's IPF? Look to the definition of Continuous Motion. Think of A1's IPF as happening away from the ball. Did the Foul occur whilte the ball was in A1's hand(s) (See two-hand set shot, Red Klotz, and the Washington Generals, but I digress.) or had A1 released the ball for his Try, and proceed from there.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:28pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
Also, if I am not mistaken, there was a play in a college game last season where a 3-point shooter, after releasing the ball and while still in the air, grabbed his defender and threw him down. The shooter was called for a foul. It wasn't deemed an intentional foul, but it could have because it was a non-basketball play. I am thinking this happened in a Marquette or Georgetown game and was perhaps reviewed on this site.
College does not have intentional fouls anymore, so we do not have to worry about that part. And intentional fouls at the HS level (and when college had them) they were not based on intent.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I cannot imagine a shooter committing an intentional foul. I guess it is possible, but I think it is a solution looking for a problem. But as Bob says, the basket could theoretically count.

Peace
More than a few years ago, I'd agree with that. But now, with the way some interpret the elbow rules and the way I've seen some calls get made even in big D1 games, there is more of a possibility.

If the shooter goes in with a leading elbow to the face of a defender, that could easily be ruled an intentional foul given the new interpretations.

And it is not that far fetched. I saw a game on TV last year where a dribbler, while going to the basket completely and inadvertently clipped a guy in the face with his elbow while going by him. The arm was only moving as everyone's arms move when they run. Upon review, the called it a FF1. I was stunned. 1/2 a second later, the guy was shooting. Not that far fetched.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Thu Nov 07, 2013 at 05:33pm.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
College does not have intentional fouls anymore, so we do not have to worry about that part. And intentional fouls at the HS level (and when college had them) they were not based on intent.

Peace
Apples and apples. They only changed the name for clarity. The underlying fouls have largely remained the same.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:34pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
In The Immortal Words Of Homer Jay Simpson ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfp View Post
It's a question on this year's IAABO test, that's why I bring it up. The idea of counting the basket if it went in seemed strange.
I got it wrong too.

__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 05:35pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Apples and apples. They only changed the name for clarity. The underlying fouls have largely remained the same.
Actually they did change or add some wording.

And unless I misunderstood, this was a question that did not include NCAA. NCAA put in rules for elbow contact that the NF has not explicitly stated were to be called more then a common foul. And even then the NCAA backed off of their explicit language that would make all elbow contact a FF1 as it was previously.

I have no problem if people want to learn the definitions. My point was it is unlikely. We can always play the "what if" game in any rule. It is just not likely to be something that someone would call unless they go looking to make that call.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)

Last edited by JRutledge; Thu Nov 07, 2013 at 05:49pm.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 06:00pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Apples and apples. They only changed the name for clarity. The underlying fouls have largely remained the same.
Hmm. It also wouldn't matter at the NCAA level, since any foul committed by a player after he shoots isn't a PC foul anyway.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 06:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Hmm. It also wouldn't matter at the NCAA level, since any foul committed by a player after he shoots isn't a PC foul anyway.
You are, of course, correct.

But that difference wasn't related to the change from Int. to FF1. It existed before.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 08:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,198
I have seen a ball handler line up a defender and plow him over on purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 07, 2013, 09:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
I have seen a ball handler line up a defender and plow him over on purpose.
Annnd? What did you have? PC or IF? Was he shooting? Did the shot go in? Et cetera...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 08, 2013, 07:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
Also, if I am not mistaken, there was a play in a college game last season where a 3-point shooter, after releasing the ball and while still in the air, grabbed his defender and threw him down. The shooter was called for a foul. It wasn't deemed an intentional foul, but it could have because it was a non-basketball play. I am thinking this happened in a Marquette or Georgetown game and was perhaps reviewed on this site.
This would be the play you're talking about (I posted it last season):

__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 08, 2013, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfp View Post
It's a question on this year's IAABO test, that's why I bring it up. The idea of counting the basket if it went in seemed strange.
We must get a different IAABO test in Missouri. I don't remember any such question. I will recheck
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 08, 2013, 10:58am
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
This would be the play you're talking about (I posted it last season):

Yes, that is the play. The contact by the shooter isn't as severe as I thought I remembered, but even with early onset dementia, I still got the teams right.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 08, 2013, 11:56am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
And I do not consider any of that action as an "intentional foul" as I stated earlier. All I am saying is I do not imagine a shooter committing and Intentional foul. If people want to get into all the "what ifs" that is fine, I just think it is a practice in futility most of the time. I think it is better to stick with real world situations, rather then things that are not likely to be called or seen.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Select Shooter on Intentional Foul? BballRookie Basketball 13 Fri Jan 25, 2013 02:21am
Foul on Shooter then PC w_sohl Basketball 34 Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:51am
shooter for technical foul shont Basketball 13 Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09pm
Sub for foul shooter Jim Henry Basketball 5 Tue Nov 23, 2004 01:48pm
Technical Foul on the FT shooter Go Gators Basketball 8 Fri Jan 25, 2002 11:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1