|
|||
Jet Man gave us the appropriate Casebook Play/Approved Rulings (CP/AR) for boys'/girls' H.S. and women's college. The ruling for NCAA Men's would be the same.
While we can debate the probabilities of an IPF or FPF being committed by a Shooter let us look at this play at a slightly different angle to see why the CP/ARs are what they are. We can divide Personal Fouls (PF) into three categories: (1) IPF; (2) FPF; (3) all other PFs. Category (3) can be subdivided into: (a) Common Fouls (CF); (b) fouls committed against a Player Trying or Tapping for a Field Goal (FG); (c) not a IF, FF, part of a Double Foul (DF) or a Multiple Foul (MF). We also know that by definition a Player Control Foul (PCF) is a CF. How can we approach A1's IPF? Look to the definition of Continuous Motion. Think of A1's IPF as happening away from the ball. Did the Foul occur whilte the ball was in A1's hand(s) (See two-hand set shot, Red Klotz, and the Washington Generals, but I digress.) or had A1 released the ball for his Try, and proceed from there. MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
If the shooter goes in with a leading elbow to the face of a defender, that could easily be ruled an intentional foul given the new interpretations. And it is not that far fetched. I saw a game on TV last year where a dribbler, while going to the basket completely and inadvertently clipped a guy in the face with his elbow while going by him. The arm was only moving as everyone's arms move when they run. Upon review, the called it a FF1. I was stunned. 1/2 a second later, the guy was shooting. Not that far fetched.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Thu Nov 07, 2013 at 05:33pm. |
|
|||
Apples and apples. They only changed the name for clarity. The underlying fouls have largely remained the same.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
In The Immortal Words Of Homer Jay Simpson ...
Quote:
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
And unless I misunderstood, this was a question that did not include NCAA. NCAA put in rules for elbow contact that the NF has not explicitly stated were to be called more then a common foul. And even then the NCAA backed off of their explicit language that would make all elbow contact a FF1 as it was previously. I have no problem if people want to learn the definitions. My point was it is unlikely. We can always play the "what if" game in any rule. It is just not likely to be something that someone would call unless they go looking to make that call. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Thu Nov 07, 2013 at 05:49pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
But that difference wasn't related to the change from Int. to FF1. It existed before.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example." "If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..." "Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4." "The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge) |
|
|||
We must get a different IAABO test in Missouri. I don't remember any such question. I will recheck
|
|
|||
Yes, that is the play. The contact by the shooter isn't as severe as I thought I remembered, but even with early onset dementia, I still got the teams right.
|
|
|||
And I do not consider any of that action as an "intentional foul" as I stated earlier. All I am saying is I do not imagine a shooter committing and Intentional foul. If people want to get into all the "what ifs" that is fine, I just think it is a practice in futility most of the time. I think it is better to stick with real world situations, rather then things that are not likely to be called or seen.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Select Shooter on Intentional Foul? | BballRookie | Basketball | 13 | Fri Jan 25, 2013 02:21am |
Foul on Shooter then PC | w_sohl | Basketball | 34 | Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:51am |
shooter for technical foul | shont | Basketball | 13 | Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09pm |
Sub for foul shooter | Jim Henry | Basketball | 5 | Tue Nov 23, 2004 01:48pm |
Technical Foul on the FT shooter | Go Gators | Basketball | 8 | Fri Jan 25, 2002 11:46pm |