"Unofficial" signals

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Adam

I wasn't even aware the delayed dead ball signal isn't in the book.

How about the five second throw in violation, and the intentional foul excessive contact, signals?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

How about the five second throw in violation, and the intentional foul excessive contact, signals?

I've never used the excessive contact signal; the only reason I even know it exists is because of the interwebs. The five second throw in violation, like the delayed dead ball signal, is something I didn't realize wasn't in the book. I admit I don't read the signal chart anymore. Maybe I should.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Adam

...

Warning, off-topic response.

What a lovely avatar you have.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Adam

I've never used the excessive contact signal; the only reason I even know it exists is because of the interwebs.

I probably only use the intentional foul excessive contact call once, or twice, a season. It's a great tool to have in your tool belt.

It's perfect for the defensive player, who is going for a block, but in a reckless manner, and knocks the shooter four rows into the bleachers. We have been taught to state, "Hard foul", along with the arms down signal.

This will often prevent some of our more knowledgeable coaches from questioning us about his player, "Going for the ball". It also helps with the less knowledgeable coaches who still question us about his player, "Going for the ball", when we can defuse the situation with a simple, "I called a hard foul coach". Of course, some coaches lack any rational reasoning ability, and no signal, or mechanic, is going to defuse the situation, in which case we can offer to serve the coach some tea. "One lump, or two, coach?"