Marginally interesting article

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by zm1283

If officials here were allowed to decline girls games, there wouldn't be enough people to work those games. We have all games assigned by one assigner and we can't decline games that are assigned. The guys high up in the pecking order don't work much if any girls basketball though. Then the majority of us work both boys and girls at various ratios of each. Then there are officials who work almost all or all girls basketball.

That might be an issue in some areas, but not an issue here. We have nearly 6000 officials statewide and there are more than enough to cover each gender regularly. It is just that the quality of girls officials are not up to standard IMO and that is more because officials can advance quicker on that side than on the boys side.

Peace

[VaTerp]

Very interesting article that bring up two related but separate issues IMO.

1) There is no question that 3 officials is preferable to 2. The girls coaches make contradictory, circular, and nonsensical arguments for voting against having 3 person crews for their games. It could be a Title IX issue but the coaches passed on the opportunity. Not sure what they're suggesting to resolve the issues they cite either.

2) The assignments of boys vs girls games is another issue and something I'm very curious about. In my scholastic association, there is no distinction between boys and girls officials. For the most part, you are expected to work what you are assigned. Our assignor does not like officials who turn back girls games or make it clear that boys games are all they're willing to work.

But the established top officials do very few girls games. We have some fairly good female officials but I think only 1 or 2 of them get any boys games. And those are few and far between.

This is my 4th year in my association. My first year I probably got 50-50 boys/girls. Second year 60/40 and last year roughly 70/30. Last season I got a boys regional semi-final and a girls state quarterfinal. This year, I got a boys regional final and will do a girls state semi. So it seems like I am moving up in the hierarchy but sort of have to pay dues with advancing further on the girls side first.

I have no problem with this and am thankful for the schedule I get. In fact, I will take a good girls game over a bad boys game most days of the week. But I do agree with some of what JRut was saying though in that I want to move up to doing NCAAM and working girls HS games doesnt help me in that pursuit. All things considered I'd rather focus on doing just boys games but that's not really a workable option right now in my association.

Ideally I think you should have a separate pool of officials for boys and girls. The concern would be having the numbers to support it, particularly on the girls side. But I think once certain officials realize they are not being assigned to work a lot or getting good games they would realize they could do better on the girls side. Similar to NCAA (and not saying that's the reason people go the NCAAW route) in having a totally seperate pool of quality officials.

Also, I think at least in my association they could do a better job of recruiting and developing female officials for girls games. I've literally seen some women who can get college games sooner than they can get GV games. Doesnt make a whole lot of sense.