|
Sun Sep 10, 2000, 03:02am
|
|||
|
|||
I know that this message board usually only discusses NFHS interpretations, however i thought that the following article would be interesting for everyone to look at.
<< http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/baske...w_off_bul.html >> Focus in on Part B It appears that the NCAA Womens Rule committee is really tring to take judgement out of our jobs. Any comments???? Keep smiling  SH 
|
|
Sun Sep 10, 2000, 08:03am
|
|||
|
|||
quote: hoopsrefBC, That was a great "find". Thanks for posting that item. I have heard of the yearly "MEMO", but that's the first time I have read one. The real CCA refs learned this stuff in July at their mandatory-if-you-want-a game clinics, I bet. mick
|
|
Tue Sep 12, 2000, 02:15am
|
|||
|
|||
quote: I don't think that it is necessarily taking away judgment from the officials, but rather defining it. Without defining what is illegal and what is not, there is a LOT of room for different interpretations. I think that this sort of thing has one goal in mind: Consistency. I think that you will start to see more of this on the men's side as well.
|
|
Tue Sep 12, 2000, 03:49am
|
|||
|
|||
quote: Judgement in the ad/dis concept. Turning the game into more black and white less grey, which i personally think is good. However many in my association disagree and say that the rules are only a guide they use when they are the ones on the court.
|
|
Tue Sep 12, 2000, 10:43pm
|
|||
|
|||
quote: They have pretty much decided on the interpretation. Some of the statements are pretty clear cut "must call a foul", "don't talk to / warn the players, just call the fouls", doesn't sound like you can interpret that to mean anything different.
|
|
Wed Sep 13, 2000, 10:12am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I skimmed them, and they seem to go both ways. It is a good base of definition, but I these ruling are too "tough". My guess is if you call an intentional foul on a post move, you'll get run. And counting the time contact is made( 2 seconds)? Again, good theory, but if there is no AD/DisAd why call it? I don't think you can put a time limit on when a disadvantage occurs from contact.
|
|
Wed Sep 13, 2000, 01:02pm
|
|||
|
|||
quote: If the article is says that officals should stop using the ad/disad concept. And that officials shouldn't judge if any ad or disad occured. They should just call the foul.(top of page 5=+) and this comming from the head of the National coordinator of Women's basketball officiating.(NCAA) I'm playing the devil, just thought this would be a good topic. keep smiling SH
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
