The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 05:44pm
I miss being on the floor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 917
Part 1 Test Question

Question:

During each extra period, each team is entitled to at least one time-out. T or F?

I answered true, but they say I got that wrong, referencing 5-11-1. What in 5-11-1 makes the above statement false? What am I missing?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 05:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by stiffler3492 View Post
Question:

During each extra period, each team is entitled to at least one time-out. T or F?

I answered true, but they say I got that wrong, referencing 5-11-1. What in 5-11-1 makes the above statement false? What am I missing?
It would be true in the second or more overtime assuming the team did NOT use their TO in the first OT.

In OT 1, if a team is out of TO's, then they are entitled to ONLY 1 TO. At least implies multiple.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:04pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
At least means exactly that, a minimum of one. It could be more if they have carryover but they are entitled to a minimum of one per OT period. I'm not sure how that question could be false.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
The statement is true. They get at least one, maybe more if they have some others left.

To say they only get 1 is wrong since they might have more.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
I would agree but these statements are to be taken as is 100% of the time.

Saying they are ENTITLED to AT LEAST one is assuming that they have at least one extra carry over. If they have NO timeouts left then the statement is false.

Therefore the statement is false because we are assuming that the statement is taken as complete truth. That cannot be true since we do not know, and the statement does not say if there is one carry over.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:14pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
I would agree but these statements are to be taken as is 100% of the time.

Saying they are ENTITLED to AT LEAST one is assuming that they have at least one extra carry over. If they have NO timeouts left then the statement is false.

Therefore the statement is false because we are assuming that the statement is taken as complete truth. That cannot be true since we do not know, and the statement does not say if there is one carry over.
Huh? If they have ZERO at the end of regulation then will have at least one on OT. What the heck are you talking about?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:14pm
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
Saying they are ENTITLED to AT LEAST one is assuming that they have at least one extra carry over. If they have NO timeouts left then the statement is false.
The question -- and the rule -- says "during" the time-out. "During" means the overtime period has started, but not yet ended. As soon as that OT period has started, each team is entitle to an additional time out.

I have TRUE.
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
At least, implies the minimum and that there could be more.

So having at least 1 TO would be that I could also have 2 or 3, etc. That is what I think the question meant.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fed Test part II question midtnblu Basketball 13 Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:32pm
Part 2 test question. gordon30307 Basketball 4 Mon Dec 27, 2004 08:41pm
Part I Test, Question # 11 garote Basketball 5 Wed Oct 06, 2004 09:55am
NF Part 1 Test Question 54 Warrenkicker Football 7 Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:09am
Part II Test Question #39 DownTownTonyBrown Basketball 31 Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1