|
|||
I don't think anyone on the Missouri State bench saw the Lead give the PC signal. He put his arm down pretty quickly when he saw the C with the block signal. They acted like it didn't happen and went with the block.
I know we're talking about the L and C here, but the T has a great look at this play if you pause it at the point of contact. Not saying he should come in and get it, but he has a good look. Last edited by zm1283; Thu Jan 31, 2013 at 10:13am. |
|
|||
I don't prescribe to all secondary defenders in the paint belonging to the Lead.
it isnt relevent whether or not you subscribe to this philosophy. the philosophy as stated is how these plays are expected to be officiated at that level. |
|
|||
Well, I occasionally work that rule set and I'm not the only who doesn't prescribe to it. I have not had any supervisor tell me that the entire paint belongs to the Lead if a secondary defender appears. What if the Lead has post players and the ball-handler dribbles away from the Trail towards the C and has a crash with a SD just below the free throw line right in front of the C? You're telling me that belongs to the Lead?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
no, i am telling you that lead is the primary on secondary defenders in the lane, not that the c cannot have a call on these plays. both officials should have gone with fists before preliminary signal, but the center should know he is secondary on this type of play and should be aware of that before he goes right to block signal.
|
|
|||
and you are forgetting the part of the philosophy that the lead has primary on contact with secondary defender when the play is going towards the basket. in the play you bring up, that is clearly not the case, therefore, the stated philosophy does not apply. now if you want to compare apples to apples we can, otherwise please feel free to bring up other exceptions.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Didn't. They had just a block as others have stated. However, the video doesn't lie. |
|
|||
Quote:
Here's an apple, A1 beats B1 coming down the middle of the court, Lead has 2 large post players jostling with each other on the bottom block, B2 from C's primary slides into the paint a couple inches below the free throw line and on the C's side of the paint. A1 crashes into B2. This is the Lead's primary even though he is already offciating an engaged matchup in his primary?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
At
A couple of thoughts here:
- BOTH C & L should have had a fist. - This was a PC. - Plays are ALWAYS easier to get right when they are coming towards you, rather than away from you. - It's very difficult for an official to see thru/past a primary defender (who just got beat) AND the offensive player to see the secondary/"new" defender. - The double whistle "areas" really require a "patient" whistle. |
|
|||
In this play the C never had to look through or past the primary defender. The primary defender took himself out the play and away from the C.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
See the now bold section of my original post. Seems pretty clear to me. |
|
|||
[QUOTE=
Here's an apple, A1 beats B1 coming down the middle of the court, Lead has 2 large post players jostling with each other on the bottom block, B2 from C's primary slides into the paint a couple inches below the free throw line and on the C's side of the paint. A1 crashes into B2. This is the Lead's primary even though he is already offciating an engaged matchup in his primary?[/QUOTE] Again, I never said that C or T cannot have whistles/calls on these plays, only that the L has the first crack at the play. Obviously, in the situation you describe, the L is probably going to be engaged in the matchup right in front of him and wont have a call, so it will be necessary for the C or T to cover this play. |
|
|||
Quote:
All day long that is the C's call in my games.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Norfolk State v. Missouri Throw-In Play (10.0 Seconds Left) | APG | Basketball | 17 | Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:39am |
Norfolk State vs Missouri -- throw-in spot after timeout | Lotto | Basketball | 10 | Sat Mar 17, 2012 02:08pm |
K-State/West Virgina Almost Blarge | MOofficial | Basketball | 36 | Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:50am |
BLARGE rears it's ugly head - Baylor vs K State | DLH17 | Basketball | 9 | Wed Mar 17, 2010 09:04am |
Missouri 17-14 OT victory over Iowa State | John Kuntemeier | Football | 3 | Thu Dec 02, 2004 03:32pm |