The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 08:49am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,667
Neither one had a fist. Duh
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 09:52am
SAJ SAJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
No...he's pointing at the player who fouled.
The pointing is really unnecessary then. It's not like there are more than 2 bodies on the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by maven View Post
How'd they handle the blarge?
I don't think anyone on the Missouri State bench saw the Lead give the PC signal. He put his arm down pretty quickly when he saw the C with the block signal. They acted like it didn't happen and went with the block.

I know we're talking about the L and C here, but the T has a great look at this play if you pause it at the point of contact. Not saying he should come in and get it, but he has a good look.

Last edited by zm1283; Thu Jan 31, 2013 at 10:13am.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 11:01am
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
I don't prescribe to all secondary defenders in the paint belonging to the Lead.


it isnt relevent whether or not you subscribe to this philosophy. the philosophy as stated is how these plays are expected to be officiated at that level.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 11:13am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
I don't prescribe to all secondary defenders in the paint belonging to the Lead.


it isnt relevent whether or not you subscribe to this philosophy. the philosophy as stated is how these plays are expected to be officiated at that level.
Well, I occasionally work that rule set and I'm not the only who doesn't prescribe to it. I have not had any supervisor tell me that the entire paint belongs to the Lead if a secondary defender appears. What if the Lead has post players and the ball-handler dribbles away from the Trail towards the C and has a crash with a SD just below the free throw line right in front of the C? You're telling me that belongs to the Lead?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 11:42am
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
no, i am telling you that lead is the primary on secondary defenders in the lane, not that the c cannot have a call on these plays. both officials should have gone with fists before preliminary signal, but the center should know he is secondary on this type of play and should be aware of that before he goes right to block signal.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 11:45am
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
and you are forgetting the part of the philosophy that the lead has primary on contact with secondary defender when the play is going towards the basket. in the play you bring up, that is clearly not the case, therefore, the stated philosophy does not apply. now if you want to compare apples to apples we can, otherwise please feel free to bring up other exceptions.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 12:10pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAJ View Post
Is the C pointing to the RA after the call? It appears so, but the defender wasn't even close to it.
Agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by maven View Post
How'd they handle the blarge?
Didn't. They had just a block as others have stated. However, the video doesn't lie.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 01:23pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Well, I occasionally work that rule set and I'm not the only who doesn't prescribe to it.
Of course you don't prescribe to it. Nobody prescribes to it.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 02:30pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
and you are forgetting the part of the philosophy that the lead has primary on contact with secondary defender when the play is going towards the basket. in the play you bring up, that is clearly not the case, therefore, the stated philosophy does not apply. now if you want to compare apples to apples we can, otherwise please feel free to bring up other exceptions.
Not my fault you said this "no, i am telling you that lead is the primary on secondary defenders in the lane" apparently leaving out the core of the apple.

Here's an apple, A1 beats B1 coming down the middle of the court, Lead has 2 large post players jostling with each other on the bottom block, B2 from C's primary slides into the paint a couple inches below the free throw line and on the C's side of the paint. A1 crashes into B2. This is the Lead's primary even though he is already offciating an engaged matchup in his primary?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 02:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 574
At

A couple of thoughts here:
- BOTH C & L should have had a fist.
- This was a PC.
- Plays are ALWAYS easier to get right when they are coming towards you, rather than away from you.
- It's very difficult for an official to see thru/past a primary defender (who just got beat) AND the offensive player to see the secondary/"new" defender.
- The double whistle "areas" really require a "patient" whistle.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 02:50pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by twocentsworth View Post
A couple of thoughts here:
...- It's very difficult for an official to see thru/past a primary defender (who just got beat) AND the offensive player to see the secondary/"new" defender.
....
In this play the C never had to look through or past the primary defender. The primary defender took himself out the play and away from the C.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 03:57pm
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
first, i have player control foul.

second, in ncaam, lead has primary on all drives to the basket when contact occurs inside free throw line and lane lines. especially when contact is with a secondary defender, as was the case in this play. at this level, this was leads call all the way, c should have had his fist up.

See the now bold section of my original post. Seems pretty clear to me.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 04:03pm
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
[QUOTE=

Here's an apple, A1 beats B1 coming down the middle of the court, Lead has 2 large post players jostling with each other on the bottom block, B2 from C's primary slides into the paint a couple inches below the free throw line and on the C's side of the paint. A1 crashes into B2. This is the Lead's primary even though he is already offciating an engaged matchup in his primary?[/QUOTE]


Again, I never said that C or T cannot have whistles/calls on these plays, only that the L has the first crack at the play. Obviously, in the situation you describe, the L is probably going to be engaged in the matchup right in front of him and wont have a call, so it will be necessary for the C or T to cover this play.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 31, 2013, 04:59pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
See the now bold section of my original post. Seems pretty clear to me.
What seems clear to me in the play being discussed is that B2 came from the C's primary and B2 had a foot outside the paint on the C's side when the crash occurred.

All day long that is the C's call in my games.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Norfolk State v. Missouri Throw-In Play (10.0 Seconds Left) APG Basketball 17 Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:39am
Norfolk State vs Missouri -- throw-in spot after timeout Lotto Basketball 10 Sat Mar 17, 2012 02:08pm
K-State/West Virgina Almost Blarge MOofficial Basketball 36 Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:50am
BLARGE rears it's ugly head - Baylor vs K State DLH17 Basketball 9 Wed Mar 17, 2010 09:04am
Missouri 17-14 OT victory over Iowa State John Kuntemeier Football 3 Thu Dec 02, 2004 03:32pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1