Passing through the basket from below

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I've got no BI here...that is not anywhere near what BI is intended for. I'd get to the violation for entering from below long before I get to BI on a ball that is below the rim having got there from below.

Me too, especially in real-time.

I was mostly trying to get the OP (and others who might be reading it) to see that s/he might have had the correct call, but for the wrong reason (at least as I read it)

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Me too, especially in real-time.

I was mostly trying to get the OP (and others who might be reading it) to see that s/he might have had the correct call, but for the wrong reason (at least as I read it)

Would anyone award points to the offense if the defense touched a ball that entered the basket from below and was half way above the rim and half below?

ART. 1

Basket interference occurs when a player:

Touches the ball or any part of the basket (including the net) while the ball is on or within either basket.

I don't think it was a violation in the OP because it had not "passed through" the rim. And I wouldn't call BI or GT for my above situation either.I don't think this is the purpose of the rule although it definitely fits the definition of BI.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

Would anyone award points to the offense if the defense touched a ball that entered the basket from below and was half way above the rim and half below?

ART. 1

Basket interference occurs when a player:

Touches the ball or any part of the basket (including the net) while the ball is on or within either basket.

I don't think it was a violation in the OP because it had not "passed through" the rim. And I wouldn't call BI or GT for my above situation either.I don't think this is the purpose of the rule although it definitely fits the definition of BI.

I think it is pretty safe to assume that the BI rule was written under the assumption that the ball was within the basket having entered from above.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I think it is pretty safe to assume that the BI rule was written under the assumption that the ball was within the basket having entered from above.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

Would anyone award points to the offense if the defense touched a ball that entered the basket from below and was half way above the rim and half below?

ART. 1

Basket interference occurs when a player:

Touches the ball or any part of the basket (including the net) while the ball is on or within either basket.

I don't think it was a violation in the OP because it had not "passed through" the rim. And I wouldn't call BI or GT for my above situation either.I don't think this is the purpose of the rule although it definitely fits the definition of BI.

I would.

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I would.

Would you care to elaborate a little more so that I can understand your point of view? And I know..... Always listen to Bob.

[bob jenkins]

If part of the ball is above the rim, then the ball is in the basket. I'd get BI.

Suppose B1 deflects the ball upward with enough force that the ball would pass through the basket, except for B2's actions of hitting the ball back down.

If the ball is just tangles with the outside of the net still 12" (or whatever) below the rim, I'd probably pass.

In between, well I'd have to se eit (as a practical matter, I probobly wouldn't think fast enough to get anything).

And, ... fwiw, I hate that saying.

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

If part of the ball is above the rim, then the ball is in the basket. I'd get BI.

Suppose B1 deflects the ball upward with enough force that the ball would pass through the basket, except for B2's actions of hitting the ball back down.

If the ball is just tangles with the outside of the net still 12" (or whatever) below the rim, I'd probably pass.

In between, well I'd have to se eit (as a practical matter, I probobly wouldn't think fast enough to get anything).

And, ... fwiw, I hate that saying.

Ok. Great point. I agree with that assessment, but Let's say that all of the touching of the ball net etc. happens below the rim instead of above as in your scenario, after the ball enters from below, then would you still award points?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

Ok. Great point. I agree with that assessment, but Let's say that all of the touching of the ball net etc. happens below the rim instead of above as in your scenario, after the ball enters from below, then would you still award points?

"In between, well I'd have to se eit (as a practical matter, I probobly wouldn't think fast enough to get anything)."

(Maybe the typos confused you.)