Book set up

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is a rule to keep off a player that is not going to play in a game that particular night?

That was the only thing I was referencing. We are not going to give a T if they have more players in the book or the wrong number if that player will never see the court.

Peace

Nope.

They can have as many in the book as they want, whether they will play that night or not. Crossing off the name or writing DNP next to the name is just a statistics thing.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Nope.

They can have as many in the book as they want, whether they will play that night or not. Crossing off the name or writing DNP next to the name is just a statistics thing.

Nope what? I do not care about stats and was not commenting on stats. I would think it would be pretty easy to know who did not play if they were in the book or not. I was only commenting on it is not necessary to cross anyone off under the rules, that was the only point.

I had a coach kick a kid off the team from one game to another in a Christmas Tournament. Do you think I care if the kid's name was crossed off in the book? Nope.

Peace

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Nope what? I do not care about stats and was not commenting on stats. I would think it would be pretty easy to know who did not play if they were in the book or not. I was only commenting on it is not necessary to cross anyone off under the rules, that was the only point.

I had a coach kick a kid off the team from one game to another in a Christmas Tournament. Do you think I care if the kid's name was crossed off in the book? Nope.

Peace

Nobody cares whether you care or not...you made a comment about coaches crossing players off not knowing the rules. I corrected you by pointing out that there is no rule coverage pertaining to that practice.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Nobody cares whether you care or not...you made a comment about coaches crossing players off not knowing the rules. I corrected you by pointing out that there is no rule coverage pertaining to that practice.

OK man. LOL!!!

You did not correct me on anything. Just stated it was unnecessary as their is no penalty or anything wrong with keeping a person in the book. If that bothers you to state that, OK.

Peace