NCAA official ruling question

[Metjets69]

Happened in a game tonight. Was curious on what happens in the situation. Player on offense is dribbling, gets hard reach in foul on defense. Words exchange, offensive player throws ball at defensive player and gets a technical. The official call was a defensive foul with a technical on the offense. What occurs in that situation in regards to foul shoots? (NCAA rules btw)

[Lotto]

Originally Posted by Metjets69

Happened in a game tonight. Was curious on what happens in the situation. Player on offense is dribbling, gets hard reach in foul on defense. Words exchange, offensive player throws ball at defensive player and gets a technical. The official call was a defensive foul with a technical on the offense. What occurs in that situation in regards to foul shoots? (NCAA rules btw)

2 FT for the T first, then resume at POI with either out of bounds or FTs for the "defensive foul."

[Metjets69]

Refs gave offensive team 2 shots and the ball as well, which didn't seem correct at the time.

[JRutledge]

Here is a possibility.

Dead ball contact in NCAAM is two shots and the ball at the division line. Is it possible that they called a T for dead ball contact and not a regular technical foul? I am only asking because if they did consider it that way then they got it right. Otherwise, all Ts would be POI administration.

Peace

[twocentsworth]

imho, this is a "Deadball Contact Technical Foul". Assess the common foul (bonus FT's may need to be shot, if so, you shoot with the FT lane cleared). Then assess the Deadball Contact Technical foul - 2 FT's AND ball awarded to the offended team at the division line opposite the scorer's table.

Because the penaly for this type of T includes possession of the ball, the penalties MUST be assessed in the order in which they occurred.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Here is a possibility.

Dead ball contact in NCAAM is two shots and the ball at the division line. Is it possible that they called a T for dead ball contact and not a regular technical foul? I am only asking because if they did consider it that way then they got it right. Otherwise, all Ts would be POI administration.

Peace

As written, though, they gave the ball to the wrong team.

I think.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Adam

As written, though, they gave the ball to the wrong team.

I think.

As written he said the offensive player committed a technical foul and that the offensive team shot the free throws and that the offensive team received the ball afterwards.

So something was not written correctly, me thinks.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

So something was not written correctly, me thinks.

Yep.

Peace

[Lotto]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Here is a possibility.

Dead ball contact in NCAAM is two shots and the ball at the division line. Is it possible that they called a T for dead ball contact and not a regular technical foul? I am only asking because if they did consider it that way then they got it right. Otherwise, all Ts would be POI administration.

Peace

I don't see how throwing the ball at another player could be considered a contact dead ball technical. This would be a class A technical (NCAAM) or a player/substitute technical (NCAAW).