Player control scenario

[deecee]

Control doesn't mean you have the ability to aim. Running after a ball bouncing out of bounds you grab it with two hands as you fall out and just throw it back in over your shoulder. Control and ability to aim are mutually exclusive.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by deecee

Control and ability to aim are mutually exclusive.

????

Really?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Adam

????

Really?

I think he meant "not synonymous"

[deecee]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I think he meant "not synonymous"

Yes more that. You need control to at least have a chance at aim. Not mutually exclusive. My vocabulary is getting worse by the day. Ack It would be easier if English had been my second language.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by deecee

You need control to at least have a chance at aim.

Not even that. I can aim a bat/tap/tip fairly well all without having any sort of player/team control.

[deecee]

Having control helps aim but having control doesn't necessarily mean you will always get the pass where you want it to go.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by deecee

Having control helps aim but having control doesn't necessarily mean you will always get the pass where you want it to go.

Of course it doesn't...but it is still another tool the OP could use in reviewing his play, right?

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by deecee

Control doesn't mean you have the ability to aim. Running after a ball bouncing out of bounds you grab it with two hands as you fall out and just throw it back in over your shoulder. Control and ability to aim are mutually exclusive.

Mutually exclusive???

Really???

So if you have control, you can't aim? And if you can aim, then you don't have control?

I attempted to give SWMoZebra another tool to use in rethinking his play...and this is what you come back with?: