|
|||
In reality, I can see where out of bounds would often be the call. However, in the OP it is a given that both players are "securely holding the ball" while still airborne. With this in mind, is held ball a possible legitimate call?
yes
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
I suppose it's technically possible, but (and maybe it's just me), I'm not determining whether the ball can't be controlled w/o undue roughness that quickly at any level except girls 7th grade "C" ball.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Three seconds is a long time. If three seconds passes before we call a held ball, someone's likely to exclaim "Someone's going to get hurt!"
I wouldn't wait that long, and I don't think there's a time requirement. Two me, if two players from opposite teams are trying to wrest control away from one another and can't in one try, I've got a held ball. I'd rather have a held ball too early than too late. |
|
|||
Play clarification
I was kinda rushed when I made the OP - - I had to get to work, and then back to the tournament, in the afternoon, for some finals, in the early afternoon. Thanks, for all the input.
The game in which the play occurred was good quality JVB game in a tournament. As Lead, on a freethrow, the ball bounded high off the rim, to my side, and B2 and A2 got some good air, grasped the ball, with enough momentum that when they came down the one player's foot was on the endline. I expected that as they landed, one or the other would demonstrate more control of the ball, and was thinking that the oob call would be certain. However, they both still had such a grip on the ball, that neither could wrest control from the other, (without excessive rough play), and the held ball call became my choice. As stated by several of the respondents, in most cases, the oob call would be the easy, preferred call. I posed the question because of the rarity of the elements of this particular play that led to my call. (Incidentally, Rob 1968 refers to the year in which I officiated my first inter-scholastic game. So Mark Sr.'s got nuthin' on me when it comes to years in the rearview. . .) Also, my use of the term "jumpball" may seem antiquated, but when I hit the whistle on a heldball, I usually verbalize "Jump!", in keeping with NFHS Officials Manual, 2.4.3 C. It seems to help with managing the possibility of excessively rough play.
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . |
|
|||
I agree with your decision, Rob.
I would offer a similar play in which both rebounders grasp the ball above their heads, but as they come down one pulls the ball into his chin causing the opponent to have his arms around this player's head and shoulders. I almost always go with the held ball prior to any foul occurring in this situation, which I believe is seen far more frequently than one player landing OOB. Btw I have rarely gotten any grief for consistently causing the above a held ball rather than a foul. I say something such as "both had it cleanly up top--held ball." |
|
|||
Quote:
Held ball.
__________________
Pope Francis |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rebounding? | schugeorge | Basketball | 6 | Sun Mar 21, 2010 03:53pm |
Rebounding | tomegun | Basketball | 24 | Mon May 02, 2005 07:52am |
Rebounding | Forksref | Basketball | 14 | Thu Feb 10, 2005 07:20pm |
Rebounding | Back In The Saddle | Basketball | 2 | Tue Mar 11, 2003 08:05am |
gps-6-rebounding | crew | Basketball | 40 | Sun Jan 06, 2002 02:36pm |