The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:27am
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post

In women's three-person they'd have our head for making that call across the lane
Not sure where you are working Women's 3 person mechanics, but around here they would have our heads for NOT having a whistle on this play from Lead as it was a secondary defender who came from L's primary area.

Granted, L was in a bad position and the evaluator would ream the L for that first, but that secondary defender should have been L's call.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 12:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 574
imho, 95% of the time when an offensive player takes a "running-floater", the defensive player DID NOT establish LGP prior to the shooter leaving the ground.....

this play (and the 95% of the other ones like this) is a BLOCK!
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by twocentsworth View Post
imho, 95% of the time when an offensive player takes a "running-floater", the defensive player DID NOT establish LGP prior to the shooter leaving the ground.....

this play (and the 95% of the other ones like this) is a BLOCK!
So, you base the call against the defense on the type of shot the offense takes?

Where do I find more information on this?
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 01:05pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by twocentsworth View Post
imho, 95% of the time when an offensive player takes a "running-floater", the defensive player DID NOT establish LGP prior to the shooter leaving the ground.....

this play (and the 95% of the other ones like this) is a BLOCK!
This play may be a block, but your first paragraph is just wrong, IMHO.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 01:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
I beg to differ.

His right foot was down but his left foot was still moving into position as the shooter went airborne.
The last time his left foot touched, perhaps....but it was down 1-2 times before that. He was in the path and had both feet down several times before he reached his final position....but he was moving forward after the shooter was airborne.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
Also, he couldn't have attained LGP until he was out of the RA since he was a secondary defender so the position of his feet on his final two steps matters even more.
Even you agree since you're mentioning his final two steps....the previous steps satisfied the two-feet on the court provision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
In terms of his body, he satified part B of the rule since his torso was facing A1 as he tried to establish. It's parts A and D where he missed.

And a player can have LGP in the RA. Until the play develops, you can't conclude he is a secondary defender. If the dribbler/driver stops, pivots and then collides, he has become a primary defender and the position is legal. If the driver/dribbler continues in one motion, the position is not legal.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 03:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad View Post
Not sure where you are working Women's 3 person mechanics, but around here they would have our heads for NOT having a whistle on this play from Lead as it was a secondary defender who came from L's primary area.

Granted, L was in a bad position and the evaluator would ream the L for that first, but that secondary defender should have been L's call.
Sorry, I meant as the primary whistle on that play. If he's secondary - which he should be - that's a different story. But if he's across the lane his whistle should come in later than the C's.

I still don't have a problem with L not putting a whistle on this particular play since he appeared to be straight-lined when the contact took place. He probably should've rotated once there was pressure in front of Valentine but he hesitated.

Last edited by JetMetFan; Mon Feb 27, 2012 at 03:46pm. Reason: add
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 03:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
The last time his left foot touched, perhaps....but it was down 1-2 times before that. He was in the path and had both feet down several times before he reached his final position....but he was moving forward after the shooter was airborne.



Even you agree since you're mentioning his final two steps....the previous steps satisfied the two-feet on the court provision.




And a player can have LGP in the RA. Until the play develops, you can't conclude he is a secondary defender. If the dribbler/driver stops, pivots and then collides, he has become a primary defender and the position is legal. If the driver/dribbler continues in one motion, the position is not legal.
Okay, so as the play developed it became apparent the Duke player was a secondary defender which meant he couldn't establish LGP inside the RA. That means he had to establish outside the RA and he didn't. It was very close but he didn't. His left foot wasn't down outside the RA before the shooter went airborne.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 04:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
If it's close enough that I have to go to that much trouble to see it was a block, I'd like to think I'd go PC.
A valid point.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 04:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy View Post
So, you base the call against the defense on the type of shot the offense takes?

Where do I find more information on this?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
After punt fiasco Rock Chalk Football 7 Sat Sep 26, 2009 08:24pm
Fiasco in SD Cub42 Baseball 7 Sat Sep 29, 2007 01:33am
Dropped 3rd Stike Fiasco njdevs00cup Baseball 21 Thu May 03, 2007 02:39pm
Fair Catch Fiasco parepat Football 16 Thu Feb 03, 2005 04:23am
Infield Fly Fiasco spots101 Baseball 45 Wed Oct 30, 2002 03:48pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1