The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 07:49am
I got a Basketball Jones!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hunger
Posts: 940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I also body seem to only be a factor if the player is not vertical towards the ball handler. In other words leaning toward the ball handler in a way that it does not allow the space of the opponent.

Peace
Please note:English is the preferred language on this board!
__________________
Lah me..
(In honor of Jurassic Ref, R.I.P.)
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 08:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Actually, it is not.

Read the rest of the rule. Two feet on the court is a momentary requirement, not a static requirement. Once two feet were down with the defender in the path (they were down long before the final position was achieve and well before the contact), they no longer have to be on the floor. The foul was because the defender was moving forward after they could no longer legally do so.
I beg to differ.

His right foot was down but his left foot was still moving into position as the shooter went airborne. Also, he couldn't have attained LGP until he was out of the RA since he was a secondary defender so the position of his feet on his final two steps matters even more.

In terms of his body, he satified part B of the rule since his torso was facing A1 as he tried to establish. It's parts A and D where he missed.

Last edited by JetMetFan; Mon Feb 27, 2012 at 08:40am. Reason: adding info
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 08:40am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
Teddy rotated high, in essence making himself a second trail, when he had a perfectly good look at the play at the center position.

I also didn't like Teddy's theatrics on the play. The way he closed down on the play, you would have thought something other than a basketball play happened.
Yeah, just noticed. Teddy stacked himself when A1 first received the pass. Based on the training I've been getting I know I would have stepped down initially.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 08:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Really wish the Lead would have had a whistle. Teddy had to look through around a defender and through the back of A1. I think he came in b/c the Lead didn't have anything. And the Trail is very far away and probably would have had the best "unstacked" look had he closed down.
Ibelieve this is Teddy's call. The drive originated from his primary and he stayed with it. I also think it was the right call.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 09:03am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by wfd21 View Post
Ibelieve this is Teddy's call. The drive originated from his primary and he stayed with it. I also think it was the right call.
It came from his primary but the contact was on a secondary defender, thus I believe the L needs to have a whistle here.

This is a good video to discuss mechanics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
I beg to differ.

His right foot was down but his left foot was still moving into position as the shooter went airborne. Also, he couldn't have attained LGP until he was out of the RA since he was a secondary defender so the position of his feet on his final two steps matters even more.
After watching the video a few times in full screen, that's how I'm seeing it as well. If this is Fed, I think perhaps the lack of an RA would give him initial LGP but I still had him moving forward as the shooter went up. At any rate, a good call I think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Based on the training I've been getting I know I would have stepped down initially.
Thanks for that tidbit.

rocky, one comment you made about pinching the paint. Isn't the L doing just that or am I misunderstanding some how?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:18am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Another perspective

I see what APG is saying, but wouldn't the *best* outcome here be the L rotating over as soon as the player put the ball on the floor? He seemed to have more than enough time to do so.

And if the L didn't rotate, wouldn't this be the perfect time to pinch the paint a bit more since the drive came from the other side?

(I know that if I see my C step out like that to cover this as a "T", I'm coming across to make him the actual T. Someone tell me why that wouldn't be the right reaction by the L. Seems to me that the T, because of the matchup, is initiating a rotation -- I have no problem with that, but as an L, I have to get over there.)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:18am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
rocky, one comment you made about pinching the paint. Isn't the L doing just that or am I misunderstanding some how?
To me, he's closed down, but not pinching the paint. That's my understanding, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:35am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
I see what APG is saying, but wouldn't the *best* outcome here be the L rotating over as soon as the player put the ball on the floor? He seemed to have more than enough time to do so.

And if the L didn't rotate, wouldn't this be the perfect time to pinch the paint a bit more since the drive came from the other side?

(I know that if I see my C step out like that to cover this as a "T", I'm coming across to make him the actual T. Someone tell me why that wouldn't be the right reaction by the L. Seems to me that the T, because of the matchup, is initiating a rotation -- I have no problem with that, but as an L, I have to get over there.)
I agree about the Lead. He has to notice that Teddy went high on A1's catch and he should have come over with a very accelerated pace. He would have gotten there in time to have a perfect look at B2 before the crash.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:41am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
To me, he's closed down, but not pinching the paint. That's my understanding, anyway.
Either closed down or pinching, the Lead still would have been straight-lined and not be able to see the contact between A1 and B2.

The crew just didn't put itself in a good position to ref this play.

I have a supervisor who really preaches hard about the C stepping down on this play in particular.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:44am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
To me, he's closed down, but not pinching the paint. That's my understanding, anyway.
OK, I guess I am misunderstanding then. How would pinching the paint look compared to this?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:46am
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
The question is not whether his foot was moving, it is whether his body was moving.
Yep snaqs that was what I was thinking. He was moving his foot after he got to the spot but he was definately in the path of the ballhandler and not moving forward after the player went airborne. So I have a charge on that end and then it looks like the contact occurs after the ball handler lands. It's close but I got a charge on that end as well.

Last edited by Sharpshooternes; Mon Feb 27, 2012 at 10:59am.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:59am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
Yep snaqs that was what I was thinking. He was moving his foot after he got to the spot but he was definately in the path of the ballhandler and not moving forward after the player went airborne. So I have a charge on that end and then it looks like the contact occurs after the pall handler lands. It's close but I got a charge on that end as well.
That's how I saw the play but I fully understand those who think B2 wasn't legal. Though Teddy may be right on the call, b/c he was stacked it feels like he was guessing. Pure speculation on my part, but from his angle I think he could see B2's left foot moving because it was outside A1's body, and he judged that B2 was still moving into position after A1 went airborne.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
I beg to differ.

His right foot was down but his left foot was still moving into position as the shooter went airborne. Also, he couldn't have attained LGP until he was out of the RA since he was a secondary defender so the position of his feet on his final two steps matters even more.

In terms of his body, he satified part B of the rule since his torso was facing A1 as he tried to establish. It's parts A and D where he missed.
Agreed, initially thought PC but after 8-9 plays and stop action.......good call IMO. Still moving over as shooter alights
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:21am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullor30 View Post
Agreed, initially thought PC but after 8-9 plays and stop action.......good call IMO. Still moving over as shooter alights
If it's close enough that I have to go to that much trouble to see it was a block, I'd like to think I'd go PC.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:24am
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
OK, I guess I am misunderstanding then. How would pinching the paint look compared to this?
He would actually be in the key (oob, of course). You know, that area where we were always told to never ref from? If he steps one big step into the key extended, he might have been able to get an angle on the secondary defender.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
After punt fiasco Rock Chalk Football 7 Sat Sep 26, 2009 08:24pm
Fiasco in SD Cub42 Baseball 7 Sat Sep 29, 2007 01:33am
Dropped 3rd Stike Fiasco njdevs00cup Baseball 21 Thu May 03, 2007 02:39pm
Fair Catch Fiasco parepat Football 16 Thu Feb 03, 2005 04:23am
Infield Fly Fiasco spots101 Baseball 45 Wed Oct 30, 2002 03:48pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1