Tonight's game

[bob jenkins]

#1 -- If it's clear that he travelled, get it. But a strong benefit of the doubt goes to the offense (i.e., legal play) here.

#2 -- If you had a competitive match-up, then you need to stay with it. If not, know that this is the type of play on which a T often needs help and expand your area.

[SmokeEater]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

#1 -- if it's clear that he travelled, get it. But a strong benefit of the doubt goes to the offense (i.e., legal play) here.

#2 -- if you had a competitive match-up, then you need to stay with it. If not, know that this is the type of play on which a t often needs help and expand your area.

+1

[ref2coach]

OK, I have a question. You state "#2: 2nd half, I'm L opposite side. A1 drives from the T's side, above the FT line extended."

If you are lead "opposite side" wouldn't the T be on your side? Did the drive in question actually come from the "C's" primary?

[Toren]

Originally Posted by ref2coach

OK, I have a question. You state "#2: 2nd half, I'm L opposite side. A1 drives from the T's side, above the FT line extended."

If you are lead "opposite side" wouldn't the T be on your side? Did the drive in question actually come from the "C's" primary?

It reads like 2 man mechanics. He says in the OP that his partner, not partners.

[Amesman]

Originally Posted by ref2coach

OK, I have a question. You state "#2: 2nd half, I'm L opposite side. A1 drives from the T's side, above the FT line extended."

If you are lead "opposite side" wouldn't the T be on your side? Did the drive in question actually come from the "C's" primary?

Since OP mentioned only a singular "partner," it sounds like a two-official game.