Intentional or not?

[Sharpshooternes]

It is not as if I had my mind made up but it is what I called. Reading some of the answers I think I got a little clarification. In my mind at the time of the call, this was not a legitimate play on the ball or excessive contact, but reading C above in the HS rules it specifically talks about it being to stop the clock or prevent it from starting. Perhaps I was off base with this call. More displacement for sure would have earned the INT but I probably should have given an +1 only.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

I probably should have given an +1 only.

cringe

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

cringe

you don't agree?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

you don't agree?

Just with the term "and one." Nothing wrong with it per se, just coach speak that makes me tune out a coach faster than "3 seconds" or "over the back."

[Sharpshooternes]

What would you like me to use?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

What would you like me to use?

And 1.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

What would you like me to use?

Honestly, I would just use "shooting foul." But, I know what you meant, everyone here knows what you meant. It's not as big a deal as my response indicated.