Act of Shooting Doc. - Peer Review Requested

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by Freddy

This is an attempt to post a link to a document about which I'd appreciate peer review. If it opens for you and you are able to decipher it, take a look and please offer feedback. Might have to print it out to be able to read it.
Used it at recent association rules meeting and it seemed to be well received.

My thanks to the Juggler for his assistance in formatting this document. He sure knows his computer stuff.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&p...3ZjQ3&hl=en_US

Associated worksheet with relevant blanks and exercises:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1.../edit?hl=en_US

Added the group worksheet to the post for further peer review...

[Jeremy Hohn]

Don't have permission on the 2nd one...and the first one is missing according to google...what am I doing wrong?

Please email them both directly to [email protected].

Thanks,

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by Jeremy Hohn

Don't have permission on the 2nd one...and the first one is missing according to google...what am I doing wrong?

Please email them both directly to [email protected].

Thanks,

There, they're free to anyone using the link now, apparently.
Firewall at work blocks my email, but will email when I get home.

[Jeremy Hohn]

was able to access them now. No need to email. Well done! I will be passing this out at my next meeting!

[bainsey]

I like it. Solid black-and-white illustration!

Now, all we need is another one: Apparent shooting motion begins > foul occurs here > "shooter" passes off, anyway.

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by bainsey

. . . all we need is another one: Apparent shooting motion begins > foul occurs here > "shooter" passes off . . .

Cf. Referee magazine article referenced in the worksheet. Corollary is: "apparent passing motion begins > foul occurs here > "passer" shoots off . . ." The mag article author handles that situation seemingly well.