![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
If the defender defends by standing between his man and the ball, then this pick is set clearly from the side, and he can see it coming. However, if the defender purposely faces his man with his back to the other player setting the pick, does this simple change in defense force the offensive player to give him more space on the pick? |
|
|||
Coach,
If you have an S&I Rulebook, look at page 68 that shows a description of a screen set from outside the field of vision and it shows a player setting a screen from behind. It references Rule 4-40-4 and talks about allowing a step. The play you described and I see often is not a blind or screen set outside the vision according to interpretation. And if it was a blind screen those screens often give way more than a step or to which all a blind screen's restriction is to give the player a step. If they take several steps and run into a player, then the screener was legal. Now if they contact was severe enough and official can judge a foul took place, but screens expect some contact and a lot of contact. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inbounds play | Quahogboy | Basketball | 16 | Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:17am |
Weird inbounds play | bigbeardedbryan | Basketball | 15 | Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:24pm |
Legal inbounds play? | rockchalk jhawk | Basketball | 9 | Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:46am |
? on inbounds play | Maxman7 | Basketball | 2 | Fri Jan 31, 2003 10:50pm |
tricky inbounds play | BigDave | Basketball | 8 | Sun Feb 10, 2002 08:35am |