Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
But it doesn't at all explain 9-1-3d, IMO.
|
The FED explanation for 9-1-3d is that it's a clarification of an existing rule. And no amount of obfuscation is gonna change that. Note.. that's not my opinion; that's exactly what is written in the NFHS link cited above.
It is what it is. If you guys want to argue, take it up with the NFHS rulesmakers. I'm just the messenger. Feel free to write them and tell them it's a rule change and
not a clarification. Be sure to let us know how that turns out.
But if it will make you feel any better, Randy agrees with you and Scrappy. And he says to tell you that you're both doing him proud.
Mon Apr 25, 2011, 05:13pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
