New Rule Survey

Adam · #1 (**permalink**) Tue Mar 29, 2011, 05:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

Guess we'll have to wait again for delayed return after a throw-in to be a violation instead of a T.

Shooting sleeve rule as is is farcical. We KNOW it is not for medical reasons.

Agreed on both.

It seems the kids are really encouraged to lie on this. Either require docs, or just let it go and regulate the colors. I'd rather see the rule make them conform to T-shirt standards, but I'd be ok with head/wrist band standards.

26 Year Gap · #2 (**permalink**) Tue Mar 29, 2011, 07:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Agreed on both.

It seems the kids are really encouraged to lie on this. Either require docs, or just let it go and regulate the colors. I'd rather see the rule make them conform to T-shirt standards, but I'd be ok with head/wrist band standards.

I'm sure the manufacturers have poured in money to the coffers of the Fed, so they won't get banned. They look dorky and I'm sure they don't increase FT percentages.

26 Year Gap · #3 (**permalink**) Wed Mar 30, 2011, 09:17am

Although I support the 20 second interval, I cannot imagine a player having time to leave the visual confines and change jerseys and be back ready to play in 20 seconds. Rare to see the same jersey remain in the game.

I see Coach P's point though, if the jersey is clean.

CoachP · #4 (**permalink**) Wed Mar 30, 2011, 09:17am

I do not have any issue with the rules as written, so the only one in the poll I'd like to see is AT LEAST a 20 second interval to rectify a blood incident. Why penalize a A1 for needing a clean up and a band aid because of a B2 foul? I have to burn a TO now. We get that courtesy on a foul out....

One thing NOT on the poll that I'd like to see is ending lane participant restrictions when the ball hits the rim/backboard on the last FT attempt. Make it on the release like NCAA. Maybe next year.......

Scrapper1 · #5 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 09:27am

Thanks to everybody for voting. I find it very interesting that only one of the proposals has more than a 50% approval, and it's only a state adoption, not even an "across the board" change.

Maybe this year, we'll actually get NO changes!

grunewar · #6 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 11:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Maybe this year, we'll actually get NO changes!

Nevada can probably find you a line on this one......

Mark Padgett · #7 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 11:11am

As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?

sseltser · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 12:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?

I believe the NCAA made an exception to either the TC rule or the backcourt rule to allow for the throw-in to go to the backcourt.

An additional effect is that if a throw-in is tipped, but not controlled, there will be TC in the case of a stoppage requiring POI.

Raymond · #9 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 02:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?

You can throw into the backcourt in NCAA even though there is TC.

Adam · #10 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 07:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

You can throw into the backcourt in NCAA even though there is TC.

Yep, because the FC is defined by the IB playing court, OOB is neither FC or BC for either team.

26 Year Gap · #11 (**permalink**) Sun Apr 03, 2011, 10:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

3-seconds.

I will hear that call this coming weekend.

Scrapper1 · #12 (**permalink**) Sat Apr 02, 2011, 03:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Can you guys come up with any more?

3-seconds.

View Poll Results: Which of these rule proposals should be accepted?
Require the free throw lane to be a solid color (eliminates extensive artwork)	5	4.81%
Clock stops on a successful field goal a minute remains in the 4th quarter or OT.	39	37.50%
Allow a 20-second interval to rectify blood before a sub is required.	33	31.73%
Require the color of the game jersey AND the pants/skirt of all teammates to be identical.	10	9.62%
Eliminate shooting sleeves, except with written medical documentation.	26	25.00%
Allow shooting sleeves, and require them to conform to headband/wristband standards.	36	34.62%
Change the closely-guarded distance from 6 feet to 3 feet.	32	30.77%
Institue team control during the throw-in.	51	49.04%
Require non-shooters to stand behind the division line during free throws for Int. or Tech. fouls.	8	7.69%
Playing halves instead of quarters by state adoption.	64	61.54%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NHFS Rule Survey	26 Year Gap	Basketball	1	Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:03pm
Another Pay Survey	WhistlesAndStripes	Football	17	Tue May 30, 2006 03:29pm
Survey	williebfree	Basketball	7	Tue Jan 14, 2003 03:28pm
Survey of the Palming Rule -- A Point of Emphasis	Jim Dixon	Basketball	17	Wed Nov 15, 2000 04:46pm