The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
New Rule Survey New Rule Survey
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which of these rule proposals should be accepted?
Require the free throw lane to be a solid color (eliminates extensive artwork) 5 4.81%
Clock stops on a successful field goal a minute remains in the 4th quarter or OT. 39 37.50%
Allow a 20-second interval to rectify blood before a sub is required. 33 31.73%
Require the color of the game jersey AND the pants/skirt of all teammates to be identical. 10 9.62%
Eliminate shooting sleeves, except with written medical documentation. 26 25.00%
Allow shooting sleeves, and require them to conform to headband/wristband standards. 36 34.62%
Change the closely-guarded distance from 6 feet to 3 feet. 32 30.77%
Institue team control during the throw-in. 51 49.04%
Require non-shooters to stand behind the division line during free throws for Int. or Tech. fouls. 8 7.69%
Playing halves instead of quarters by state adoption. 64 61.54%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 09:27am
Lighten up, Francis.
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,691
Thanks to everybody for voting. I find it very interesting that only one of the proposals has more than a 50% approval, and it's only a state adoption, not even an "across the board" change.

Maybe this year, we'll actually get NO changes!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 11:07am
9/11 - Never Forget
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
We got a bet here.........
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
Maybe this year, we'll actually get NO changes!
Nevada can probably find you a line on this one......
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 11:11am
certified Hot Mom tester
  
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Question
As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett View Post
As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?
I believe the NCAA made an exception to either the TC rule or the backcourt rule to allow for the throw-in to go to the backcourt.

An additional effect is that if a throw-in is tipped, but not controlled, there will be TC in the case of a stoppage requiring POI.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 02:33pm
Courageous When Prudent
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett View Post
As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?
You can throw into the backcourt in NCAA even though there is TC.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 07:53pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
You can throw into the backcourt in NCAA even though there is TC.
Yep, because the FC is defined by the IB playing court, OOB is neither FC or BC for either team.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 03, 2011, 10:58am
Aleve Titles to Others
  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett View Post
As far as instituting team control during the throw-in, what changes would this make to the game other than teams not being able to inbound into the back court from front court and having offensive fouls during a throw-in be non shooting? Can you guys come up with any more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
3-seconds.
I will hear that call this coming weekend.
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 03:34pm
Lighten up, Francis.
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett View Post
Can you guys come up with any more?
3-seconds.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NHFS Rule Survey 26 Year Gap Basketball 1 Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:03pm
Another Pay Survey WhistlesAndStripes Football 17 Tue May 30, 2006 03:29pm
Survey williebfree Basketball 7 Tue Jan 14, 2003 03:28pm
Survey of the Palming Rule -- A Point of Emphasis Jim Dixon Basketball 17 Wed Nov 15, 2000 04:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50am.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1