The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Robinson, IL
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
Don't have my books with me, but is what you just said in the book? Because simultaneously does not mean "approximately the same time" - it means "the same time".
NFHS 4-19-10

A simultaneous foul (personal or technical) by opponents is a situation in which there is a foul by both teams which occurs at approximately the same time, but are not committed by opponents against each other.

The penalty for simultaneous fouls includes no FTs and the ball placed at the POI.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Fair enough. I stand corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Robinson, IL
Posts: 266
The only difference between a false double foul and a simultaneous foul here is the question of what is "approximately the same time".

Is it one second? Is it three seconds? Is it until the foul is reported?

It is an area that has no answer in the book, and as far as I can tell, no official interpretation from the Federation.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:34pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illini_Ref View Post
The only difference between a false double foul and a simultaneous foul here is the question of what is "approximately the same time".

Is it one second? Is it three seconds? Is it until the foul is reported?

It is an area that has no answer in the book, and as far as I can tell, no official interpretation from the Federation.
I personally think that is reading a lot into the play when from all previous information from the NF that they have always given those as an example of things that happen at the same time. Not we call a foul, then call another foul as a result of the first action. That sounds like a stretch of what the rules says. Maybe they could clarify, but these should like events that happen one after the other.

Just as I said this, HB responded to me.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Robinson, IL
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I personally think that is reading a lot into the play when from all previous information from the NF that they have always given those as an example of things that happen at the same time. Not we call a foul, then call another foul as a result of the first action. That sounds like a stretch of what the rules says. Maybe they could clarify, but these should like events that happen one after the other.

Still waiting on HB BTW.

Peace

100% agree.

Maybe an official interp from the Federation would be in order. Or maybe change the rule and always shoot all technicals in the order they occur then go to POI.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:40pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illini_Ref View Post
100% agree.

Maybe an official interp from the Federation would be in order. Or maybe change the rule and always shoot all technicals in the order they occur then go to POI.
Check your PM over "there" and I sent you the email response.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Robinson, IL
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Check your PM over "there" and I sent you the email response.

Peace
Got it. Thanks.

Over "there". That is a good way to describe that place at times.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Can you give us some background on the game?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Robinson, IL
Posts: 266
The game had the situation described in the original post.

I'm not sure how it was handled, but it prompted a question about it to a local veteran official and rules "guru". He thought and thought and finally called our state association. His quandary was what does app. the same time mean.

His answer from them was that there was nothing in the rules or interps to answer that question. The lady there said that she was fine with saying it was "app. the same time" in this situation until the first technical was reported.

That makes this a simultaneous technical. No FTs and the ball at POI which is the FTs for the first personal foul.

I don't necessarily agree and there was no "official" interp given. It was strictly a meeting of the minds on the phone.

I think that you could go with a false double T and back it by rule. I also think that with her explanation you could go with a simultaneous situation.

It's all how you articulate it to the coach really.

Last edited by Illini_Ref; Tue Feb 08, 2011 at 04:47pm.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illini_Ref View Post
The game had the situation described in the original post.
I meant more as a who what when where.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 04:29pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illini_Ref View Post
NFHS 4-19-10

A simultaneous foul (personal or technical) by opponents is a situation in which there is a foul by both teams which occurs at approximately the same time, but are not committed by opponents against each other.

The penalty for simultaneous fouls includes no FTs and the ball placed at the POI.
Yeah, but simultaneous is usually when we cannot determine which took place first or last. This is not the case here as the officials did not call them at the same time in this play. A1 reacted to the T being given. I cannot see how we can make this simultaneous.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What kind of foul? bsaucer Football 21 Sun Aug 15, 2010 04:02pm
What kind of whistle do you use? bas2456 Basketball 48 Wed Apr 08, 2009 04:54pm
Shoes Not what kind but ..... chartrusepengui Baseball 15 Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:26am
NBA - Kind of impressed IREFU2 Basketball 4 Mon Nov 06, 2006 03:00pm
what kind of comments/arguing from a coach constitute a technical foul? thereluctantref Basketball 49 Mon Mar 06, 2006 06:12pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1