![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
A simultaneous foul (personal or technical) by opponents is a situation in which there is a foul by both teams which occurs at approximately the same time, but are not committed by opponents against each other. The penalty for simultaneous fouls includes no FTs and the ball placed at the POI. |
|
|||
The only difference between a false double foul and a simultaneous foul here is the question of what is "approximately the same time".
Is it one second? Is it three seconds? Is it until the foul is reported? It is an area that has no answer in the book, and as far as I can tell, no official interpretation from the Federation. |
|
|||
Quote:
Just as I said this, HB responded to me. ![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
100% agree. Maybe an official interp from the Federation would be in order. Or maybe change the rule and always shoot all technicals in the order they occur then go to POI. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Over "there". That is a good way to describe that place at times. |
|
|||
The game had the situation described in the original post.
I'm not sure how it was handled, but it prompted a question about it to a local veteran official and rules "guru". He thought and thought and finally called our state association. His quandary was what does app. the same time mean. His answer from them was that there was nothing in the rules or interps to answer that question. The lady there said that she was fine with saying it was "app. the same time" in this situation until the first technical was reported. That makes this a simultaneous technical. No FTs and the ball at POI which is the FTs for the first personal foul. I don't necessarily agree and there was no "official" interp given. It was strictly a meeting of the minds on the phone. I think that you could go with a false double T and back it by rule. I also think that with her explanation you could go with a simultaneous situation. It's all how you articulate it to the coach really. Last edited by Illini_Ref; Tue Feb 08, 2011 at 04:47pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What kind of foul? | bsaucer | Football | 21 | Sun Aug 15, 2010 04:02pm |
What kind of whistle do you use? | bas2456 | Basketball | 48 | Wed Apr 08, 2009 04:54pm |
Shoes Not what kind but ..... | chartrusepengui | Baseball | 15 | Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:26am |
NBA - Kind of impressed | IREFU2 | Basketball | 4 | Mon Nov 06, 2006 03:00pm |
what kind of comments/arguing from a coach constitute a technical foul? | thereluctantref | Basketball | 49 | Mon Mar 06, 2006 06:12pm |