NCAA-W, correctable or not?

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Yes.

Ok, glad I wasn't imaging things.

No.

Why not? It's a case where there is no correctable error, yet the free throw is wiped out and there's a "do-over".

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Ok, glad I wasn't imaging things.


Why not? It's a case where there is no correctable error, yet the free throw is wiped out and there's a "do-over".

When the first FT for the 1-1 is shot, we've (well, they've) failed to award the merited FTs for the T. It's a CE right there. It's discovered, and corrected, by have the FTs for the T shot.

In the ruling, merited FTs were shot, but were "ignored" because of the DQd player. I dont' see them as similar at all. Maybe I'm mis-reading the play.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

When the first FT for the 1-1 is shot, we've (well, they've) failed to award the merited FTs for the T. It's a CE right there.

That makes sense.

In the ruling, merited FTs were shot, but were "ignored" because of the DQd player.

Maybe in the ruling, they're saying the ball never became live because the required substitution never occurred?