fould during throw in?

[hawkeyegb]

ok thanks guys...I'm just getting back into ref. but was this rule different back in the 90's?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by hawkeyegb

ok thanks guys...I'm just getting back into ref. but was this rule different back in the 90's?

No.

[Indianaref]

Originally Posted by hawkeyegb

ok thanks guys...I'm just getting back into ref. but was this rule different back in the 90's?

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

No.

How about the 1890's?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Indianaref

How about the 1890's?

Iirc the first infringment for holding, shouldering, etc. by the defense was a foul. The second infringment was disqualification of the defender until the next goal was made. However if there was an evident intent to injure, the person committing the infringment was disqualified for the rest of the game with no substitute allowed.

And also if the infringement was a consecutive foul by the defense, we counted a goal for the opponents.

Did you want rules citations too? I believe it was rule #5 and rule #7.

[Loudwhistle]

Originally Posted by Indianaref

How about the 1890's?

Good one, I was going to ask about 1930's, but you sank my battleship with that one!!