Subs with multiple fouls

[JRutledge]

Why does it matter? If you bring in subs before the play can continue then who cares when you bring them in? All that matters are when the last FT is taken all the appropriate subs are in the game. Before that is irrelevant. I have never really thought much about it until now. Subs can come in to shoot a T so why worry if they come in or not if they are not shooting a T?

I think this entire thread is over-thinking an irrelevant issue. All that matters is players are in the game before the last FT. Whether it is a personal foul, a technical foul or some other kind of foul is really not going to change anything in the outcome of the game.

Peace

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I think this entire thread is over-thinking an irrelevant issue.

I'm so glad you offered your opinion on an irrelevant issue. Thanks.

[Scratch85]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Personally, I'm likely going with A in practice because I prefer to get an offending player (for the T) out ASAP if his coach is trying to help me out.

I think most all officials agree with this and would likely do just that. But as far as the OP goes, the subs were there before any of this happened. So they likely are for one of the other 9 players on the court. If you allow them in you may still have B1 on the floor.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I think this entire thread is over-thinking an irrelevant issue.

But a great way to learn and I don't have anything better to do today?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Scratch85

I think most all officials agree with this and would likely do just that. But as far as the OP goes, the subs were there before any of this happened. So they likely are for one of the other 9 players on the court. If you allow them in you may still have B1 on the floor.

True, but it's a low risk (as Rut indicates, nothing's really going to go wrong if you let them in) high reward move.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I'm so glad you offered your opinion on an irrelevant issue. Thanks.

The point is it does not matter what you do. It does not matter in the end when they come in and that is why the issue is irrelevant. Worrying about it is not going to change the result. Actually I doubt most people would even care either way when evaluating you. So why sit up night and worry about it? I guess some people have to worry about something.

Peace

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

So why sit up night and worry about it? I guess some people have to worry about something.

Why are you sitting up all night worrying about other people sitting up all night worrying about something? Is it because some people have to worry about something?

And why am I worrying about you worrying about some people worrying about something?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

The point is it does not matter what you do. It does not matter in the end when they come in and that is why the issue is irrelevant. Worrying about it is not going to change the result. Actually I doubt most people would even care either way when evaluating you. So why sit up night and worry about it? I guess some people have to worry about something.

Peace

I think it's an interesting exercise in rule study; but I didn't lose any sleep over it.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I think it's an interesting exercise in rule study; but I didn't lose any sleep over it.

Whatever you say man.

Peace

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jrutledge

whatever you say man.

peace

lol

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

lol

Admit it, you had nightmares over this thread.