![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
If it were a normal situation with KSt down, I'd also pass on a deliberate foul IFF the X player had a direct scoring opportunity available.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
Of course, I think the missed called was the clearly illegal screen the Xavier player set. ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
I was told that by Irene Hughes, the "World's Most Accurate Psychic". Yeah - right.
__________________
Yom HaShoah |
|
|||
I've got nothing. Shooter was fading to the side and the contact was marginal and didn't really affect the shot or the landing.
|
|
|||
That depends on what supervisor you are working for or what camp you are attending.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Wouldn't even consider a foul on that.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
In this case, the foul would have largely negated his "chance" to score, actually benefiting the fouler more. I'm not inclined to call an infraction that directly/immediately benefits the offender when the offended is no worse off. If the K-State player wanted a foul, they need to, without committing an intentional, knock him off his path by getting in his path and committing a block or by making him lose the ball as a result of contact.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Did anyone else catch Martin's comment to the official near the end of the 1st OT? A KS player gained possession and there was "marginal" contact as he made a clean pass to Clemente. The foul was called, putting the passer on the line, where he missed 1 of 2, allowing X the opportunity to tie it up. Martin's comment was "You'll make that call, but not the one before?" Obviously, he would have rather had Clemente on the line. He has a point in that KS was put at a disadvantage by making that call, when not making it would have forced X to foul a better FT shooter.
I don't disagree with the no-call or the quick whistle on the second call. It does raise the question that others have discussed as to how these calls are made based on the "strategy" employed by a leading or trailing team. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() The correct answer is that the official thought that one was a foul and the other one wasn't. That's how the guys at this level make those calls based on "stategy" or whatever. They use their judgment. And if somebody higher up the food chain doesn't like or agree with the bulk of their judgments, they won't be back next year to make any more judgments. All Martin was doing was second-guessing the official. He has to though; I think that it's written somewhere in the NCAA Coaches Manual as being mandatory. All the official does in cases like this is nod his head and let it go in one ear and out the other. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
It is "Luckie." Did something happen with him this year or last?
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
switch | fullor30 | Basketball | 13 | Fri Jan 23, 2009 03:37pm |
Should I Switch? | PIAA REF | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:38pm |
Switch-Hitter vs Switch-Pitcher | Jurassic Referee | Baseball | 39 | Thu Jul 03, 2008 01:06pm |
2 man OOB switch | OldCoachNewRef | Basketball | 14 | Thu Jan 20, 2005 08:53pm |
New NCAA mechanics - Long switch or no long switch? | jimcrket | Basketball | 5 | Mon Oct 15, 2001 01:40pm |