Thread: Here's a switch
View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2010, 09:33am
DLH17 DLH17 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: depends on your perspective
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
The rules are basically the same. Clemente's undetected foul, however, would not have been an intentional IMO. He fouled the dribbler across his arms in an "attempt" to reach for the ball. The reason, IMO, that it was not called are in order:
  1. The Trail was straight-lined and didn't see the contact
  2. The contact was marginal and did not hinder the ball-handler
Is it correct to say this falls somewhere within the "advantage/disadvantage" philosophy? Seeing the play through? This is my reasoning on the play. Nothing really impeded the XU player from completing his dribble across half court and past his player setting the screen nearer the 3 pt arc.

Last edited by DLH17; Fri Mar 26, 2010 at 09:36am.
Reply With Quote