Fri Mar 26, 2010, 09:20am
|
|
Courageous When Prudent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,951
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillblind
Mark, I can't disagree with DVR, but I saw it as I described. So for sake of argument lets go with my scenario. I believe it was exactly like the 2 or 3 year old NFHS Interpretation. K-State deflected toward the back court. The ball was in the air over the back court, but that still equals front court status. Once Xavier touced the ball, Xavier caused it to go backcourt. Had the ball bounced first in the BC then I say play on.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
If it was exactly like the interpretation, it was not a violation. The interpretation was/is bogus.
|
In some people's opinion.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
