IMO, they were wrong and shouldn't come back.

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by constable

Maybe the official's realized that whacking someone for dunking in the warm up is a great way to piss off an entire team.

Originally Posted by constable

I've said it before, and I will continue to say it that it is a foolish rule.I've heard the arguments about having to replace a backboard after a hard dunk during the warm ups but if that's the case should we not ban dunking period?

I think there are much bigger fish to fry.

I've said it. It's my opinion and that's all there is too it you can't fault me for stating my opinion, so no need to flame me.

Constable, I did not flame you.

My point was - there is a rule (like it or not), and as an official, I am not going to concern myself with "pissing off" (your words) an entire team for enforcing a rule that most, if not everyone, knows.

Should we not give an unsporting T's for taunting or chest thumping because it would "piss off" an entire team? Inappropriate Backboard slaps? Chinups on the rim? Intentional fouls? Enforcing these rules could "piss off" an entire team. Where do we draw the line?

You're entitled to your opinion. I respect it.

Me, in this case, WHACK! And the player and I are going over to the coach and HE is going to explain why the game will start off with the T and shooting foul shots.

JMO

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by grunewar

You're entitled to your opinion. I respect it.

I respect his right to have an opinion. I sureasheck don't respect his opinion though.

Worrying about whether any call is gonna piss off a team is ridiculous in my opinion. And that's not a flame either; it's an opinion.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

I respect his right to have an opinion. I sureasheck don't respect his opinion though.

Exactly. Just like on the court, people need to learn to distinguish between "you're wrong" and "you're an idiot." Only one of those is a flame.

OTOH, some posters need to learn how to say "you're wrong" without implying "you're an idiot." (I'm not implying that JR is among those.)

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by mbyron

OTOH, some posters need to learn how to say "you're wrong" without implying "you're an idiot." (I'm not implying that JR is among those.)

You're right.

You're also an idiot.


Set yourself up for that one, didn't ya?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

You're right.

You're also an idiot.


Set yourself up for that one, didn't ya?

Uh, takes one to know one.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Uh, takes one to know one.

I know, I know......

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Exactly. Just like on the court, people need to learn to distinguish between "you're wrong" and "you're an idiot." Only one of those is a flame.

What about "You're wrong, you idiot"?

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

What about "You're wrong, you idiot"?

Ah, I see you've been talking to my wife!

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by grunewar

Ah, I see you've been talking to my wife!

Not exactly "talking".