![]() |
|
|
|||
![]()
Touching the ball does not confer control. If the ball was just touched in the f/c and not controlled til it was retrieved in the b/c, I've got nothing. Start 10 sec count and play on...
__________________
Prettys Womans in your city |
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks |
|
|||
Perhaps a good way to explain it is, on a throw-in, you need to know what status the ball has when possession is established. If you know that, then you can rule on everything that happens after that. First, does the exception apply (airborne when ball is first touched)? If so, no violation. If it doesn't, then answer the following questions?
1. Team Control by A? (If so, move to the next) 2. Ball has frontcourt status? (If so, move to the next) 3. A was last to touch in frontcourt? (If so, move to next) 4. A was first to touch after the ball has obtained backcourt status? If you answer yes to all, you have a violation. If you answer no to any, you don't. These may happen quickly, but process: once you've identified control, then you just have to watch status. If it goes frontcourt to backcourt, then you have to determine who touched it last in frontcourt and who touched it first after it went backcourt. Long explanation for: you have to watch the ball and the player. Last edited by jdw3018; Thu Feb 11, 2010 at 10:25am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Not correct, and it leaves out too many possibilities. The correct decision procedure is: "Yes to all: violation; otherwise not."
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Right, of course, and what I meant to type. Will edit to correct. Thanks.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
1. Is this player establishing team control at this time? If so, no violation as you have a player establishing team control with BC status. If TC had already been established, then it matters what happened before, and what status the ball has had prior.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Work through it. Answer the four questions above.
|
|
||||
Quote:
If the player is airborne when catching the ball, it doesn't matter which foot lands first. The player is entitled to a "normal landing." Even if the FC foot lands first, if a normal landing puts one foot in the back court (and on the line counts), this player has BC status with the pivot foot in the FC. If this player then starts dribbling while BC status is in effect, the three points rule comes into play and the player will not gain FC status until the ball and both feet hit the FC in immediate succession. As an aside: if the player gets two feet in the FC, but is dribbling in the BC, he will gain FC status by picking up the dribble.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Backcourt violation? | zac | Basketball | 5 | Sat Oct 24, 2009 09:47pm |
Backcourt Violation? | williebfree | Basketball | 39 | Thu Feb 10, 2005 05:21pm |
Backcourt violation? | jroche | Basketball | 34 | Fri Dec 21, 2001 01:41pm |
Backcourt Violation? | Mark Dexter | Basketball | 8 | Fri Nov 30, 2001 08:21pm |
Backcourt violation?? | glind | Basketball | 6 | Mon Jan 08, 2001 09:43am |