The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Simultaneous Lane Violatins Simultaneous Lane Violatins
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 10:57pm
CK CK is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 87
Simultaneous Lane Violatins
Does anyone but me think that 9-1-3 is unfair? I understand how this fits into the rules as written. This just does not seem Fair.

CK
Last edited by CK; Tue Feb 09, 2010 at 11:02pm. Reason: misspelled
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 11:15pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by CK View Post
Does anyone but me think that 9-1-3 is unfair? I understand how this fits into the rules as written. This just does not seem Fair.

CK
What do you think would be so unfair about it?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 11:34pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Going by the title (book's in the car with my stuff), I assume you're talking about the fact that a simultaneous FT violation that occurs during what is not the final free throw is essentially a free pass for the defensive side of it. I agree, but I'm not sure what could be done differently.

Maybe clear the lane for the final shot and go to the arrow.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 11:44pm
CK CK is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 87
Snaq's once again you are correct. Not sure either, soliciting thoughts on this subject. Representing????????.

CK
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 09:03am
Courageous When Prudent
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,934
It's fair in that the offense has committed a violation yet still has a 50/50 chance of retaining possession.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 09:59am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
It's fair in that the offense has committed a violation yet still has a 50/50 chance of retaining possession.
He's talking about when it happens on the first of two free throws. The penalty is identical to that of a simple offensive FT violation. Cancel the shot and move to the next one.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 10:20am
Courageous When Prudent
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Going by the title (book's in the car with my stuff), I assume you're talking about the fact that a simultaneous FT violation that occurs during what is not the final free throw is essentially a free pass for the defensive side of it. I agree, but I'm not sure what could be done differently.

Maybe clear the lane for the final shot and go to the arrow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
He's talking about when it happens on the first of two free throws. The penalty is identical to that of a simple offensive FT violation. Cancel the shot and move to the next one.
Oh, well in that case, I still don't see it as that unfair. It's a lot fairer than the CE rules.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 11:36am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 133
Think About It
There is no such thing as a "simultaneous FT violation". End of issue
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 11:45am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCAAREF View Post
There is no such thing as a "simultaneous FT violation". End of issue
Really? I'll bet you representing's game check there is.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 11:46am
In Memoriam
  
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by CK View Post
Does anyone but me think that 9-1-3 is unfair? I understand how this fits into the rules as written. This just does not seem Fair.

CK
Are you talking about rule 9-1-3 or rule 9-1PENALTIES(Section 1) 3?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 11:49am
In Memoriam
  
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCAAREF View Post
There is no such thing as a "simultaneous FT violation". End of issue
NFHS rule 9-1PENALTIES(Section 1) 3 doesn't exist? Have you told the FED rulesmakers that? I'll bet that they're gonna be pissed off when they find out about it.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 02:18pm
CK CK is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 87
9-1PENALTIES(Section 1) 3
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 10, 2010, 11:03pm
CK CK is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 87

Sorry JR I corrected this. My Bad.
Any more thoughts on this rule?

CK
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How lane occupants can enter the lane HawkeyeCubP Basketball 14 Fri Jan 23, 2009 02:40pm
poi on simultaneous t's kmw Basketball 1 Sun Jan 08, 2006 09:51pm
Simultaneous T's ripcord51 Basketball 5 Sun Jan 23, 2005 01:01pm
Simultaneous Lane Violation? mplagrow Basketball 3 Mon Feb 03, 2003 10:01pm
simultaneous lane violations Ralph Stubenthal Basketball 3 Thu Jan 20, 2000 04:02pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39pm.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1