|
|||
The crew certainly improperly administered the penalites here. In addition to assessing the technicals improperly, #20 from Hoover comes off the bench and throws at least two punches at the kid who was originally punched.
That being said, anyone who blames this fight on the crew for not calling a common foul prior to the fight, is an idiot. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
So I gotta say that I personally agree with you as to it being a no-call. For the life of me, I can't see how anyone could call what he did "fighting" though. Again, jmo...... |
|
|||
Agree completely, there is no excuse for the way they administered. I was just saying that everything I saw would be penalized. To be honest after watching it again I could see not penalizing the kid for pushing back, it was more of a "get away and stop punching me shove" than it was retaliation. And after he did that he even sort of ducked behind a couple other players so the kid wouldn't come after him..
|
|
|||
Smart move. That wasn't going to end well for him otherwise.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Had one kid punch another in a grade school game probably almost 20 years ago, other than that nary a punch/fight in 17 yrs of high school games...lucky I guess. Watch this Friday
|
|
|||
Another thought, not to derail but. . .
Watch the calling official on the original foul (never mind if it's flagrant, intentional, team control, or charge as he signaled). After he calls the foul, he is immediately moving to the table...if he holds his position for one more second, he is in position to get between those players and potentially defuse the situation before it gets out of hand. Just a reminder to not always be in such a hurry.
__________________
If it's not one thing -- it's your Mother. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
Why would the official ever be in a rush to get away from something like that? |
|
|||
I am glad someone else noted that #20 black came out of nowhere and threw some punches, and then kept following the W player.
Other than one was a live ball foul and one was a dead ball foul (granted AFTER a punch) what was different about the foul #23 and #10 committed? Both were two handed pushes. I would go flagrant on the live ball push and vanilla "T" on the dead ball push. And looking at the physical stature of #10 I would THINK about tossing him, FOR HIS OWN SAFETY!!! He DID prove he could take a punch, but regardless! Having not been there, the calling official may have been getting information from the trail official in regards to "Upgrading" the foul. He may have only seen the W player lunge forward and B arms extended. The Trail may have seen that the push was flagrant. They may have been getting together to exchange information Finally, isn't there a little blurb about a player "popping" his jersey? THAT should have been a "T" as well. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
If not, that statement ties for the dumbest ever made on this forum. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fight? | RCBSports | Basketball | 19 | Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:21pm |
Fight! | CLH | Basketball | 22 | Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:00am |
Fight! Fight! | lrpalmer3 | Basketball | 18 | Wed Jun 13, 2007 08:24pm |
Cat Fight! | LarryS | Basketball | 29 | Fri Jan 26, 2007 06:19pm |
fight | ChrisSportsFan | Basketball | 8 | Tue Feb 15, 2005 09:37am |