The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 30, 2010, 10:28pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Okay, need some help here from someone who knows NCAA rules.

Watching a D1 game live today. V11 drives to the basket and is fouled by H44 while attempting a shot. (Lead called it, but Trail came in with the intentional....it was definitely a foul but the intentional part was very questionable)
...
I saw that play(St. Louis@Richmond?). When the foul occurred I immediately thought intentional/excessive contact was a possibility. When the trail came in with "crossed arms" I was glad my instincts were validated.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 31, 2010, 12:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
I saw that play(St. Louis@Richmond?). When the foul occurred I immediately thought intentional/excessive contact was a possibility. When the trail came in with "crossed arms" I was glad my instincts were validated.
No, it was actually Northern Iowa at Missouri State.

Here is the video. It's toward the end and they replay it during the interview. Yes, I know that they keep using the term "flagrant"....

Video : Panthers Nip Missouri State 55-54
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 31, 2010, 11:25am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
No, it was actually Northern Iowa at Missouri State.

Here is the video. It's toward the end and they replay it during the interview. Yes, I know that they keep using the term "flagrant"....

Video : Panthers Nip Missouri State 55-54
Oh...well that is an easy "excessive contact" foul...perfect call.

Not sure how you consider it "questionable".
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 31, 2010, 11:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Oh...well that is an easy "excessive contact" foul...perfect call.

Not sure how you consider it "questionable".
Look at it in this video about 10 seconds in.

YouTube - Northern Iowa at Misouri State mens basketball, Jan. 30

The only part of the defender that touches the shooter is his left arm, which makes contact with the shooter's arm and the ball. The fall looked nasty, but it wasn't because of any excessive contact.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 01, 2010, 12:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Look at it in this video about 10 seconds in.

YouTube - Northern Iowa at Misouri State mens basketball, Jan. 30

The only part of the defender that touches the shooter is his left arm, which makes contact with the shooter's arm and the ball. The fall looked nasty, but it wasn't because of any excessive contact.
There is absolutely no way from that video that you can say it wasn't excessive contact.

It looked like a clothesline on an airborne player to me. I have no problem with the intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 01, 2010, 04:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
There is absolutely no way from that video that you can say it wasn't excessive contact.

It looked like a clothesline on an airborne player to me. I have no problem with the intentional.
Why? After watching it live and seeing that video, I don't see how the Trail could come and get that. The Lead had a much better look at the defender's left arm (That one that actually made contact), and the right arm didn't touch the shooter. I realize the drive started in the Trail's area, but I thought he was reaching quite a bit. (For full disclosure, I am a fan of the home team)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 01, 2010, 04:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Why? After watching it live and seeing that video, I don't see how the Trail could come and get that. The Lead had a much better look at the defender's left arm (That one that actually made contact), and the right arm didn't touch the shooter. I realize the drive started in the Trail's area, but I thought he was reaching quite a bit. (For full disclosure, I am a fan of the home team)
I'm just saying that the video you show is no indicator either way. I could make an argument for why it absolutely should be excessive contact as easily as you make the argument that it shouldn't be.

Considering this was C that called it (not T - L was across the lane) he was the only official with a good angle on the play.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 01, 2010, 08:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Why? After watching it live and seeing that video, I don't see how the Trail could come and get that. The Lead had a much better look at the defender's left arm (That one that actually made contact), and the right arm didn't touch the shooter. I realize the drive started in the Trail's area, but I thought he was reaching quite a bit. (For full disclosure, I am a fan of the home team)
This was a no brainer. A textbook call by a quality crew.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 01, 2010, 09:00pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Look at it in this video about 10 seconds in.

YouTube - Northern Iowa at Misouri State mens basketball, Jan. 30

The only part of the defender that touches the shooter is his left arm, which makes contact with the shooter's arm and the ball. The fall looked nasty, but it wasn't because of any excessive contact.
You cannot see all the contact from the angle this was taken. The original video you posted from the same angle as the C's viewpoint indicates contact to the head. And it was the C who made the "crossed arms" signal.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clarification on NCAA Player Control rule bradfordwilkins Basketball 2 Mon Apr 06, 2009 02:56pm
Injured player ... how do you Johnny Ringo Basketball 7 Mon Dec 10, 2007 07:03pm
rule interp: injured player & alternating poss. blewthat Basketball 6 Fri Dec 23, 2005 12:03am
NCAA injured player ChuckElias Basketball 8 Thu Dec 08, 2005 05:33pm
ASA rule change - injured player Dakota Softball 12 Sun Nov 17, 2002 12:25am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1