Vote of Confidence?

[zm1283]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Good. Now you're lumped in with the clowns that would throw their partners under a bus instead. Yup, good choice.

There was the other option. Rich and Kingsman gave us the professional way. You don't criticize your fellow officials publically with non-officials. If you have complaints, feedback, etc., re: your officiating brethren, by all means bring 'em forth. But keep it in-house.

What partners? I'm talking about the play where the two officials awarded three FTs for an intentional foul. If I'm sitting with friends, and this happens, and they know and I know that we all are seeing the same thing and they ask me about it, I'm going to simply say "Yeah, it should be two FTs". I'm not talking about inciting a crowd of rednecks to heckle fellow officials....of course I wouldn't do that.

Please explain how they could possible "Have something else" on this play?

For the record, I would not have handled the situation at BK like JAR did. That is throwing your partners under the bus IMO.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by zm1283

What partners? I'm talking about the play where the two officials awarded three FTs for an intentional foul. If I'm sitting with friends, and this happens, and they know and I know that we all are seeing the same thing and they ask me about it, I'm going to simply say "Yeah, it should be two FTs". I'm not talking about inciting a crowd of rednecks to heckle fellow officials....of course I wouldn't do that.

Please explain how they could possible "Have something else" on this play?

What they could have had was a shooting foul (bucket was good) followed by a T, but that was clearly not what was signaled. Verified later that intentional foul was the call, but the penalty was improperly awarded.