Sub not in game for disqualified player

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I agree. In the OP, though, the sub reported prior to the horn. Now, it's up to the official to get the game going, as they broke their "huddle" as soon as the horn sounded.

One thing that has failed to be addressed. As soon as the sub reports to the table the officials should get the game going. Not after the 20-second horn and not after the team breaks the huddle.

As soon as that sub gets to the table we should be proceeding with the game.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

One thing that has failed to be addressed. As soon as the sub reports to the table the officials should get the game going. Not after the 20-second horn and not after the team breaks the huddle.

As soon as that sub gets to the table we should be proceeding with the game.

I guess my assumption here has been that the sub reported close enough to the horn that this wasn't an issue; based on the fact that the officials didn't know and had to ask if he'd reported on time.

Frankly, while I think the officials were correct in not assessing the T here, I think that's about the only part of the situation they got right.

1. They shouldn't have had to ask whether he reported on time. I'm typically standing at the table waiting for the sub; I'll know if he reported on time.

2. It really doesn't seem like they informed the player it was his fifth foul. I've never seen a player come back after being informed it was his fifth. The oversight in #1 leads me to believe that this is as likely as not.

[grunewar]

Anyone see this today? This game was MADE for this forum/thread! Multiple T's, fans throwing things on the court.......and the Lakers not replacing a DQ'd player in time and getting another T from the ref. Cool beans!

Cavaliers cruise as Lakers fans, players vent their frustrations - USATODAY.com

I wonder if they follow the Forum to give us material? Nah....