Technical foul after held ball

[Adam]

What was the throwin for? That should answer your question.

Alternatively, if the arrow had been pointing to the visitors, would you take the arrow away from them?

[Back In The Saddle]

Assuming this was played using NFHS rules, single technical fouls do not involve returning to the point of interruption. The penalty for a single technical foul is two free throws plus the ball for a throw-in at the division line. As for the AP throw-in, whatever would have happened had the T not occurred ... simply does not happen.

[Refsmitty]

Meaing the arrow would not change?

[Berkut]

The arrow does not change until the throw in is complete. The throw in never happened, so no, the arrow does not change. There never is an alternating possession procedure.

[tbarron]

My partner and I got it right then. We did not change the arrow.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Refsmitty

Meaing the arrow would not change?

Correct. The throw-in is for the technical foul penalty; it's not an AP throw-in.

Originally Posted by tbarron

My partner and I got it right then. We did not change the arrow.

Attaboy!

[Juulie Downs]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Attaboy!

Oh. My. Gosh. Tanner is channelling mick!!