The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Technical foul after held ball Technical foul after held ball
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgetown, KY
Posts: 5
Technical foul after held ball
This happened in a game last night.

During a game we have a held ball. The possession arrow is to the home team. After the whistle, a player for the visiting team swings an elbow at the opposing player but does not make contact. A technical foul is called. The free throws are administered and the ball is given to the home team at mid court.

Does the possession arrow change to the visiting team after the throw in? And, if the possession arrow had been to the visiting team, should they have been given the ball because of the “point of interruption”? The alternating possession situation is where my confusion is.

This is one of those weird situations that came up during the game last night. It was late in the game with only a minute or so left, so the possession arrow never came into play again, but as I thought about it last night after the game on the ride home, I was trying to remember what we would have done if it had been earlier in the game.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 11:11am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
What was the throwin for? That should answer your question.

Alternatively, if the arrow had been pointing to the visitors, would you take the arrow away from them?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Assuming this was played using NFHS rules, single technical fouls do not involve returning to the point of interruption. The penalty for a single technical foul is two free throws plus the ball for a throw-in at the division line. As for the AP throw-in, whatever would have happened had the T not occurred ... simply does not happen.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 11:50am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 280
Meaing the arrow would not change?
__________________
Refsmitty
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 218
The arrow does not change until the throw in is complete. The throw in never happened, so no, the arrow does not change. There never is an alternating possession procedure.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 02:26pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgetown, KY
Posts: 5
Got it right
My partner and I got it right then. We did not change the arrow.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 05:17pm
M.A.S.H.
  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
Meaing the arrow would not change?
Correct. The throw-in is for the technical foul penalty; it's not an AP throw-in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbarron View Post
My partner and I got it right then. We did not change the arrow.
Attaboy!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 10:26pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
Attaboy!
Oh. My. Gosh. Tanner is channelling mick!!
__________________
It's not who you know, it's whom you know.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 01, 2009, 11:59pm
M.A.S.H.
  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juulie Downs View Post
Oh. My. Gosh. Tanner is channelling mick!!


At least it's not Mark, right? I don't think I can pull off the fishnets.

Just kidding, Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 02, 2009, 12:36am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juulie Downs View Post
Oh. My. Gosh. Tanner is channelling mick!!
The world could use another heapin' helpin' of mick.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 02, 2009, 07:35am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post


At least it's not Mark, right? I don't think I can pull off the fishnets.
I didn't think that there was anything worse than imagining fishnets ON Padgett.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Held Ball or Foul? djskinn Basketball 41 Mon Jan 29, 2007 07:40am
Held Ball/Foul ehcco Basketball 35 Tue Jan 10, 2006 03:56pm
Foul? Travel? Held ball? ChuckElias Basketball 10 Wed Dec 28, 2005 08:05pm
held ball or foul ysong Basketball 19 Fri Jun 03, 2005 02:59pm
held ball/technical scyguy Basketball 7 Wed Oct 20, 2004 07:09am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55am.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1