Foul by disqualified player

[Adam]

It just dawned on me that the tackle would be a flagrant personal rather than a flagrant technical.

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

It just dawned on me that the tackle would be a flagrant personal rather than a flagrant technical.

It can't be a flagrant personal foul, since A1 was not in the game at the time.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch

It can't be a flagrant personal foul, since A1 was not in the game at the time.

Based on which rule? The ball is live.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

If we're discussing the OP ("B6 tackles A1"), then I agree. If we're discussing the case play (B6 blocks the shot), then I don't think it qualifies as flagrant.

I was and I agree that the case play (B6 blocks the shot) isn't flagrant.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I think you need to check your humor plug-in.

The only way I'd issue a direct to the coach on this is if s/he said "go in and block that shot."

Ok, you caught me.

Originally Posted by chartrusepengui

I understand your thinking, but, this player has already been disqualified. I think that since already DQ'd - I would go with the two technicals. It really does not matter if one is flagrant as far as the penalty goes - they are already disqualified with coach notified. They know they are disqualified and still committed the infractions. They would certainly not be on the bench any longer. Since coach did not necessarily "allow" A1 to participate - he would not add to the T count.

In my opinion, it doesn't matter if the player was DQ'd or not - I'm calling two Ts.