Foul by disqualified player

[just another ref]

If you go with two Ts, what's the difference if one is flagrant or not?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by just another ref

If you go with two Ts, what's the difference if one is flagrant or not?

Maybe nothing. Maybe state sanctions for fighting. The point is, I think, that the tackle needs to be labeled flagrant simply because it is a flagrant foul.

[SmokeEater]

Originally Posted by just another ref

If you go with two Ts, what's the difference if one is flagrant or not?

In the interp it was mentioned that there is an advantage if 2 T's are not called in this example? Since team B was up by 3 then only calling 1 T will only give team A 2 shots, even if flagrant the game was over in the interp.

In the OP you could go withthe 1 T and make it a flagrant for the tackle, then A would get the ball back again since it does not say if its the end of the game or not.

[Adam]

In the case play, A6 does not foul the shooter, he only blocks the shot.

[Fathertime]

The main debate we had was is do we award two free throws or four and do we treat it as one penalty or two.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Fathertime

The main debate we had was is do we award two free throws or four and do we treat it as one penalty or two.

You can justify going either direction, IMO.