![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
NFHS Rules:
Once two officials give conflicting foul signals on such a play, then the crew MUST go with a double personal foul and resume at the POI per Case Book 4.19.8 Situation C. |
|
|||
Quote:
I have a new question on this subject. Double whistle. Neither official gives a preliminary signal, but they have opposite opinions of the play. Each is positive that he is correct. Is it ok to go with a blarge if this happens?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
I just don't understand the resistance to following what the NHFS wants in this specific situation. NCAA-M have the rule/case written the same as NFHS. NCAA-W has written the rule specifically to go with the call of the primary official. Why can't we just accept that we should call it the way the respective governing bodies want to us to call it?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Wed Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03am. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
||||
Quote:
I think your theory has merit, too, and may have factored into it.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
B1 reaches across and whacks A1 on the arm while A1 simultaneously pushes off with the other arm. I am assured by most that this was not the intent. So, what was it? To call attention to the fact that one official got a call wrong, and subsequently make that wrong call stand rather than give the officials a chance to decide which call was right? Furthermore, the idea that the whole deal hinges on the preliminary signals would never have occurred to me. So, while we're on the subject........ I have asked this before, but I don't recall ever getting an answer. Play in your primary. Contact. You have an obvious blocking foul call. You go up with a fist, but hearing your partner's whistle, hold the prelim signal. Partner comes in, emphatically making his PC signal. What do you do?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Let him have the call and then have a very lengthy post-game.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
Same answer to both plays. |
|
||||
Quote:
I knew immediately that we'd talk about it later. He was a great partner (I've moved since) and teacher.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
I'm going to see what my commish has to say on this one. I have a funny feeling he will say: "get together, it cant be both so make one call not some cheesy double foul, and then figure out which one of you two knuckleheads should have held his preliminary signal and dont do that again." But then again, he's a common sense guy
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
HS or college supervisor: "report the blarge and never let it happen again"
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Blarge | tjones1 | Basketball | 4 | Thu Dec 28, 2006 01:46am |
Blarge -- or was it? | rainmaker | Basketball | 3 | Sun Mar 26, 2006 09:04am |
Blarge | All_Heart | Basketball | 14 | Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:39pm |
Another Blarge | Snake~eyes | Basketball | 6 | Fri Jan 13, 2006 03:16pm |
Blarge or not? | ChuckElias | Basketball | 9 | Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:57am |