The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 14, 2009, 07:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
There always have been a few, more than played football IIRC. Almost made me want to wrestle.
Could not get a date otherwise?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
And don't worry, all middle sons shame their families. It's just part of the deal.
I've been saying that for years.

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 14, 2009, 09:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
WI is allowing 16 minute halves for varsity non-conference if both coaches agree.

I hope this is one step from changing it for all games. 2 less last second shots and 2 less timeouts, what's not to like?
I believe this is exactly what the Iowa Girls are doing as well. Non-conference games, both coaches need to agree to it. I would be willing to bet that not one single varsity game I officiate this year will be played with the 16 minute halves option. Personally, I would prefer two halves instead of four quarters. Seems to work well for the college game and I think eliminating two breaks in the action would be a positive thing.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 14, 2009, 09:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaMike View Post
I believe this is exactly what the Iowa Girls are doing as well. Non-conference games, both coaches need to agree to it. I would be willing to bet that not one single varsity game I officiate this year will be played with the 16 minute halves option. Personally, I would prefer two halves instead of four quarters. Seems to work well for the college game and I think eliminating two breaks in the action would be a positive thing.
I think you may see it in conference games where the competition is uneven (aka blow outs). Some teams might want to get the pain over with quicker. I am interested in seeing what conferences vote to use it (requiring it for conference varsity games).

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 14, 2009, 10:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Can anyone else confirm/admit that I was not the only one who read the OP topic's first three words and got a bit too excited about this thread?

I mean, I figured somebody would have made an absolute lay up of a joke by page 3, but here I am!
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 06:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Negative Ghost Rider.
Had to look up 'ghost rider'. Which sense did you mean?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 07:15am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Had to look up 'ghost rider'. Which sense did you mean?
None of the above.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 07:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 280
half-full

A parent friend tells me that Mass. went from halves back to quarters last year, mostly based on eligibility for players to "swing" between JV and V -- with halves, if the JV kid came up and would play only garbage time, they'd be ineligible if they had seen action in both halves of the JV game which means the kid is penalized for being promising enough to get a taste of V action

The effect is positive for the big girls whose stamina takes a beating...with a judicious substitution, a good coach can get them two-plus minutes of rest with little impact on the court at the end of Q1 going into Q2 and at the end of Q3 going intno Q4
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 08:32am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by amusedofficial View Post
A parent friend tells me that Mass. went from halves back to quarters last year, mostly based on eligibility for players to "swing" between JV and V -- with halves, if the JV kid came up and would play only garbage time, they'd be ineligible if they had seen action in both halves of the JV game which means the kid is penalized for being promising enough to get a taste of V action

The effect is positive for the big girls whose stamina takes a beating...with a judicious substitution, a good coach can get them two-plus minutes of rest with little impact on the court at the end of Q1 going into Q2 and at the end of Q3 going intno Q4
Hmmmm, now that you bring that up, I think I'll have to see how the halves impact such eligibility because how many games a girl plays in has been determined by how many quarters of a game they played in. Could make for some interesting messes in the JV/V doubleheaders.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 09:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Ah, you omitted the comma. Makes more sense now.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 09:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch View Post
Hmmmm, now that you bring that up, I think I'll have to see how the halves impact such eligibility because how many games a girl plays in has been determined by how many quarters of a game they played in. Could make for some interesting messes in the JV/V doubleheaders.
States permitting the option of halves instead of quarters need to rewrite their participation rules so that players may participate in 3 halves in a day instead of 5 or 6 quarters.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 10:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
States permitting the option of halves instead of quarters need to rewrite their participation rules so that players may participate in 3 halves in a day instead of 5 or 6 quarters.
Don't quote me but I believe that's exactly what MN did. That's the only logical way to handle it really.

Last edited by bbcof83; Thu Oct 15, 2009 at 10:34am.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 11:17am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
States permitting the option of halves instead of quarters need to rewrite their participation rules so that players may participate in 3 halves in a day instead of 5 or 6 quarters.
The only problem with that in Iowa is the halves can only be used in Varsity play. That's why I brought up the interesting scenario for JV/V doubleheaders. I'm still looking for an explanation of how that's handled.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 11:19am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
A reminder that each individual player has a 21-game season limitation. A student who plays 0-2 quarters in a day is charged with 0 games against this limitation. A student who plays in 3-6 quarters in a day is charged with 1 game against this limitation. A student who plays in 7-8 quarters in a day is charged with two games against this limitation. For implementation of this experimental rule, a player who plays in either the first half or the second half will be charged with 2 quarters. A player who plays in both halves will be charged with four quarters.
Found my answer on the Iowa girls association website. This was the paragraph below the OP quoted paragraph in their announcement of the experiment.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch View Post
The only problem with that in Iowa is the halves can only be used in Varsity play. That's why I brought up the interesting scenario for JV/V doubleheaders. I'm still looking for an explanation of how that's handled.
Not a problem. A half is still defined in sub-varsity ball, even if the clock runs quarters.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 15, 2009, 12:42pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
I believe Washington has separate governing organizations, but I'm not positive about that. I was told back in the early 90's that Iowa was the only state that did so, but a friend in WA said were similarly divided.
Nope...just one. The good old WIAA runs boys and girls stuff.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sad day in Iowa Huskerblue Football 21 Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:03pm
18-minute halves Forksref Basketball 4 Tue Dec 27, 2005 05:12pm
4 quarters vs, 2 halves restarts refnrev Soccer 7 Tue May 10, 2005 12:44pm
MSU vs Iowa Bandit Basketball 12 Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:51am
MSU/Iowa St. Matt S. Basketball 3 Sun Mar 26, 2000 12:03pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1