The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 23, 2009, 01:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Velley Forge, PA
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeschmit View Post
I disagree as well. What is the ultimate point while officiating? Get the play right! If you know in your mind that something your partner did is completely wrong, you and your "team" will look much better if you come together, figure out what the questionable call was and get it right. When I first started officiating, I had an over and back call that I made incorrectly, and my partner (who was much more experienced at the time) came in and talked with me about what happened. I then owned up to having an IW, and we continued play. I think that the appearance of getting the play right is much more important in the coaches' minds than letting your partner live and die on his/her own. Besides, they will learn what they did wrong whether you let them live and die or if you help them out at the time.

However, this doesn't apply to judgment calls that your partner may make that are questionable. They will have to live and die on calls dealing with their judgment and they will have to explain their reasoning to coaches.
I would agree that fixing an OOB is much easier. You have a distinct point of interruption from which to work from. You simply give th eball to the team that has the mistaken violation called against them.

In this situtation, how do you fix it? Ball went in. You give them the basket? The ball underneath? I don't see a POI there to fix this cleanly. That was why I would have let it go and counseled him later. It's a tough deal.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 23, 2009, 08:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Sometimes a partner needs a little direction.

Hey, that was my partner at the last middle school game I did!
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 23, 2009, 12:05pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOracle View Post
I understand your view. Where do you draw the line? There is also no easy POI to fix this with. That's where I would elect to save something like that for a bigger mistake or something that can be easily fixed.
Sure there is, the whistle came after a successful shot. Re-read the OP. POI is to count the basket and give the ball to the non-scoring team. It doesn't get any clearer than that.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 23, 2009, 12:20pm
Eschew obfuscation.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOracle View Post
In this situtation, how do you fix it? Ball went in. You give them the basket? The ball underneath? I don't see a POI there to fix this cleanly. That was why I would have let it go and counseled him later. It's a tough deal.
I guess it could be a HTBT sitch. If you know for sure that the whistle went early (before the shot), then get it right and go with POI. If it's close, go with your gut instincts. It's tough, but I think that I would want to get this right. Oh yeah, and be ready to explain all of this to the coaches because they are going to be confused as h3ll!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 23, 2009, 08:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
I explained to him that we don't tell the coach when they have one timeout left, by rule, and because if we were mistaken, if they actually have none left, and we grant them a timeout, to find out that there was an error in communication between the table, official, and coach, that there would be a technical foul penalty, which, I'm sure, the coach wouldn't appreciate.
Is that any different than telling him he has none left when he actually has one? I would think he wouldn't appreciate that either. I know what the rule says but that guy you worked with does have a point.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 24, 2009, 09:26pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Not liable for damages arising from use or misuse

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDUB View Post
Is that any different than telling him he has none left when he actually has one?
Yes. It's very different. No technical foul.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ok, so it's not every year. . . Scrapper1 Basketball 4 Thu Oct 02, 2008 01:21pm
A year later... ref18 Basketball 1 Sun Jan 30, 2005 12:34am
first year ref an first year coach blarson Basketball 4 Thu Dec 19, 2002 04:26pm
Thanks everyone, see you next year... JimNayzium Football 0 Mon Nov 11, 2002 12:12pm
Next year kman Baseball 5 Tue Sep 25, 2001 02:41pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1